Saturday, August 7, 2010

Barack Obama...Boys night out! Suspicious to Tattler readers!






When I logged in today, and checked for responses to posts, one got a rise out of me!

A "Tattler" reader was quick to highlight an ABC News headline, utter up an editorial (comment), and fire it off to moi!

ABC News

Post: 08/07/10

"And what do make of today's ABC News online headline: "With wife and daughter away, Obama has his boys over."? Not the Globe or Tattler, ABC News?!"

For starters?

This is what I think:

"Boys night out!"

In fact, according to the brief (very brief) ABC snippet, Barack will savor a round of golf with buddies early in the afternoon, and later the 1st Dude's closest circle of buddies will satiate their hunger - off the green - with a barbecue (with all the trimmings) on the White House Lawn.

What, no poker (five card stud)?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/08/with-wife-and-daughters-away-obama-has-his-boys-over.html

As to the part-tay, this inquiring mind wants to know - at a minimum - if there will be any drunken orgies in the pool and sauna cum - um - around midnight?

If so, will Secret Service let me pass through the side gate at the beguiling witching hour?

As to the "Globe" - that giant of the Literary world known for its excellence in reporting -, well, it's pretty much a given what their ballsy reaction will be.

The week-end will - undoubtedly - warrant a two-parter rife with all the juicy details!

According to the titillating gossip rag, these kinds of drunken romps (when Michelle is out-of-town and-out-of-harm's way) ) are nothing new.

In fact, the lusty (suspicious) editors have hinted that the President oft takes these footloose and fancy-free occasions to dabble in a litttle erotic "homosexual" fantasy leisure activity.

Surely, folks caught the screaming headlines of one particularly eye-catching issue, at the supermarket check-out which alleged that the President is "gay"?

Post: 06/20/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/06/barack-obamagay-rumors-plague-president.html

In closing, I'd like to thank the "anonymous" individual who posted the comment!

I can't always keep track of the nefarious sexual antics of all of the debauched Politicians on Capitol Hill, let alone the chi chi get-togethers hosted by a healthy black man (who has chosen to exercise his power and authority over the social planner at the White House) when Michelle is out spending the coin of the realm.

Shades of John F. Kennedy?

You betcha!

Oh, Daddy, the silver hair is a turn-on!




Mickey Rourke...foul language on Leno! Jay fleshes out character...




Mickey could have been a Hollywood contender!



Ooops!

Did Mickey Rourke just call some dude a pri**" on Network TV?

Judging by Jay's stunned silence, I'd have to reply in the affirmative.

OMG!

After sipping up a dash of pepsi a moment later, the gutteral sounds sprang forth once again.

Mickey uttered up the vulgar derogatory term (often used to describe the male anatomy in the ugliest of fashions) a second time - and in about two seconds flat - the segment descended rapidly into a realm normally presided over by a posse of white-trailer trash rough-necks.

The colorful interview started off innocently enough when Jay asked the street-wise actor (known to inhabit his roles with great gusto) if he ever worked odd-jobs before he became a recongized bankable star.

Mickey started off by admitting that it was tough-going in his younger days.

But, fortunately for the gritty character actor  - he was blessed with this sort-of  Uncle (wink wink)  - who called him up with tasks to undertake now-and-then.

"I was in the money collection business, 'ya know?"

The audience roared!

Rourke then got a kick out of elaborately describing his first "job" - with so much candor and hilarious detail - that I was on the floor in stitches.

As the tawdry tale goes, a two-bit piece of hoodlum sh** allegedely owed his "Uncle" some cash.

So, eager beaver nephew (!) Mickey was hired on to pay the difficult dude a visit, 'ya know?

"I was kind-of a gangster," the likeable star chuckled to Jay who was bent out-of-shape forward on the desk all ears with ubiquitous chin jutting out.

"The guy was a real pri**," he growled.

Which caused a lot of tittering in the packed house on the NBC lot in Burbank.

Oh boy, THAT word again.

Mickey Rourke isn't a dude to mince words, after all.

"Well," he continued, "The tough guy was giving me a hard time, 'ya know?"

"The pri** didn't want to pay up, no Sir."

"When he started to play games with me, well, I snapped," he recalled in so many words.

So, I pulled out a gun, to scare the scoundrel a tad.

There was a distinctive "whoa" from the audience at this juncture as they edged forward in their seats in total disbelief anxious to learn of the outcome.

Was this a tall tale spun from Rourke's active imagination, or the real deal?

In a little scuffle that followed, the revolver went off by accident, Rourke excitedly recalled in his blow-by-blow account.

"Hold on, wait a second," the jerk-off belted out scared shit-less.

"I've got it," he barked out, as he reached for a wad of bills on the inside pocket of his jacket.

At this point, Rourke sat back in his chair, and chortled wickedly.

"When I went back to my Uncle with the cash, he thought I had done good."

Uh-huh.

So, the ballsy out-of-work struggling actor rose up in the ranks in his Uncle's favor, a keeper.

A short while later, Rourke was summoned to shake-down another dead-beat dude, who was allegedly a tougher piece of work that the first, to get through to.

"The basta** won't cough up the dough," his uncle snarled in so many words.

So, Mickey, trundled off to confront the guy, with ultimate aim of  "collecting" pocketting some much-needed cash for himself for a job well-done.

"The little pri** didn't want to pay up," he confided to the audience.

But, there was a big problem.

When he turned up to collect, it turns out that the scammer was a dwarf about 4 1/2 feet tall with a hump on his back.

"Man, there was no way I could make that dude pay up. Even though I knew he was lyin' through his teeth, I couldn't hurt him."

Ah, an enforcer, with a heart.

"So, I lost my job, go figure!"

"It's so hard to move up in the corporate world," Jay quipped in response.

The talk turned to his new film, "The Expendables".

In the clip the actor shared with the rapt audience, Rourke looked pretty "bad ass" with his long greasy hair, slack-jaw, and riot of biker-inspired tattoos that appeared to be inked all over his buffed - but battered-looking - bod.

When quizzed about how he landed the plum role, Rourke hesitated a moment, then shyly noted that good pal - Sly Stone - offered it to him.

No horse's heads in Sly's bed?

"When we knocked heads about the project, he told me I could write what I wanted. I didn't have to read for it, or anything."

For the record, I should note that when Rourke first trotted onto Jay's jazzy stage, there was quite a bit of hoopla all 'round..

Avid fans hooted and hollered amidst a thunderous round of applause - which I expect was due the fact Rourke has neared Pop Culture status - because of a character he breathed his all into -no stops-barred - in Iron Man II.

But, at the couch, the interview was off to a bumpy start.

"What happened to your hair, man," Leno exclaimed, as he gave it a shocked once-over.

"Did 'ya cut it yourself?"

"Yeah," he gruffly barked  back.

"I used to cut hair, but went a little overboard."

One side of his head was shaved so close in one spot, that bare skin was glancing through in a disturbing fashion.

And, 'round the rest of his noggin', the thick mop was cropped pretty close.

What an uneven, hideous mess!

And, his suit?

Hated it!

The icky pattern reminded me of wallpaper - and screamed of - Used Car salesman.

Rourke's stab at respectability with the mainstream movie-going audience perchance?

At the Iron Man II opening night celebrations his style was right on tap.

What happened, Mickey?

Iron Man II
Red Carpet Opening

Post: 05/08/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/05/iron-man-2bang-for-buck-rourke.html

Though, there were a few awkward moments into the gab fest at first, Jay - the comfortaable old shoe that he is - managed to soften up the tired worn leather nonetheless.

If ever there was a role model for what can go wrong with plastic surgery, Mr. Rourke gets first shake at the title, for sure.

The Interview?

Memorable, troubling, revealing.

Which way he's going in his personal life - up, down, sideways - is anyone's guess!

His career, well, it's going gangbusters!

Ironic, that!



Michael Phelps...dragged a** in 200 medley at U.S. Championships! Say what?




Pecs and Gold Medals do a body good!




Rivals!




It was a humbling experience for Phelps tonight at the U.S National Championships.

"That hurt, holy crap," Phelps fessd up, after losing to a top rival way down by the seaside.

Uh-huh!

Ryan Lochte snagged it tonight when he swam to glory in 1:54.84 seconds flat - in a whirlwind 200 meter individual medley stroked strong and strident - putting Phelps to shame.

Losses, according to the bruised Olympic Gold Medalist, always motivate.

Awful on Wednesday?

Well, then, a disaster tonight!

'Dude, I think about 20 meters left, I just saw you pass me like I was standing still. I kind of ran into a brick wall."

Ouch!

A second-place comer - hitting the wall @ 1:55.94 - didn't sit well with the world-class swimmer.
Usually, Phelps is able to boast a strong showing in individual medleys, where there is no baggage to bog him down.

For Lochte, it was kind of a double-whammy.

The win, spoke for itself, of course.

But besting Phelps, that was the icing on the cake.

Although there have been wins against the Golden Goy in the past, he'd never managed to ever skim past Phelps to score big in a major National or International meet.

Suppose, he was down so long, that it started to look like up to him.

But, now?

The terrain shifts a tad, don't 'ya think?

Oh, by the way, before I get distracted further - Tyler Clary - nabbed third place (1:59.19).

Lochte can attribute the breastbroke and freestyle stints to his winning streak.

 I think, keen observers would agree.

In the instance of Phelps it was a case of hitting the wall.

"Just physically I felt like my body shut down," Phelps confided in the aftermath.

Oh, well, there are always challenges ahead to make a better swimmer (and man) of  'ya, eh?

The remainder of the night's competition - though exciting - didn't hold much muster for me.



Did Michael throw a bone  to his sexy splashy pal?

Friday, August 6, 2010

Governor Schwarzenegger...equipped to handle gay nupitals! Licenses in stock!








California is "well-equipped" to perform gay nupitals, according to Governor Schwarzenegger, in response to a directive put forth by a Federal Court on Wednesday in respect to the thorny issue of same-sex marriages in California.

Huh?

When Judge Vaughn Walker overturned the ban on gay marriages, Protect Marriage - an appellant in the proceeding - argued that permitting gay nuptials at this stage of the legal proceedings would be an administrative hardship for the state because higher courts they have appealed to could later invalidate the marriages.

So, the obvious reaction was forthcoming from the Court.

Would it be a hardship?

Quick on the uptake - though initially reluctant to jump into the fray - the Governor fired off his response (with a touch of villainous glee, I expect).

"As the Court has pointed out, California already issued 18,000 marriage licenses to same-sex couples (before the ban was imposed by virtue of Prop 8) without suffering any resulting harm," Schwarzenegger's office eloquently noted in their written arguments to U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker.

"Government officials can resume issuing such licenses without administrative delay or difficulty."

If my memory serves me well, though, didn't ARNOLD actually veto a bill in recent years which would have ushered California out of the dark ages and into a golden era of equality for all (straight and gay) in respect to tying-of-the-knot ceremonies down at City Hall?

So why - pray tell - has the Governor now chosen to dust off his own tuxedo and take a stand for the inalienable Constitutional rights of same-sex couples?

An upcoming election, dahlinks, of course!

OMG!

And, not to forget, that the racks in San Francisco and West Hollywood are well-stocked with dozens of tuxedos in - delicious plum, vivid sky blue, rich shades of wine, and pristine white (for the virgins in the crowd) too.

Patent leather shoes, penny loafers?

No problem, will that be cash or Visa, Sirs?

In tony Beverly Hills, there will also be a myriad of fashion accessories to scoop up, too: rainbow cravats, silk pocket puffs, ivory gold-trimmed cuff-links (with matching studs (!), and more ruffled silk shirts in a dizzying array of pastel colors than you can shake a big stick at (wink wink)

Downright spiffy, you girly-man, you!



If we could only sort out the snags in medical marijuana!

http://www.julianayrs.com

Yoko Ono...to nix parole for John's killer! PBS Special to highlight NYC in 1970s!




The Dakota
(Home of Lennons & set for Rosemary's Baby)







"I remember the day that George Harrison was shot," he noted sadly to his co-workers around the water cooler.

Boy, this guy's memory was shot to hell, I mumbled to myself.

Imagine that!

A Beatle fan mixing up his mop-headed Liverpudlians!

"John Lennon" I cried out frustrated across the busy hall, shaking my head in disbelief.

George passed away from cancer, I muttered to myself, half disgusted.

As to John's death, well, I vividly recall that fateful day in 1980 when John was shot down in cold blood and a pall fell over the country.
Three decades after John Lennon's death, Yoko notes that she still opposes the killer's parole because he remains a potential threat.

Of course, that dark day remains uppermost in my mind, because of eerie events that befell me a couple of days earlier on December 6th.

I was deep in slumber, wrestling with a kaleidescope of images in a disturbing symbolic dream, when I suddenly felt myself lose balance - then slowly slip backward and down - against the rough surface of a cold brick wall.

When I glanced up, I spied a shadowy figure step out of the darkness, and point a gun at me.

No! No! No!

Suddenly, the stranger fired a couple of  shots in my direction.

As I started to fall into what seemed like a bottomless pit, I was jolted awake, and found myself sweating upright in bed muttering to myself.

"Someone's going to be shot. A famous person is going to be shot."

But, who?

That was the frustrating part.

I didn't have a clue!

A couple of days later, the awful news streaked at lightning speed on airwaves around the globe, amidst a lot of hysteria.

"John Lennon has been shot!"

That was thirty years ago. 

Today, the drama continues to unfold, albeit in a practical way.

Next month, Mark David Chapman - who is currently in jail for senselessly murdering John in 1980, is up for parole.

At a press junket to promote a PBS special, Ono noted to reporters, that she is still vigilante in her efforts to ensure that the parole request by Chapman is denied.

Not out of vengeance, but for practical reasons, she explained calmly.

At his last hearing, Chapman (who claimed to be a devoted fan of Lennon when he was originally apprehended so many moons ago) insisted that he was ashamed and sorry for gunning down the popular Beatle.

He told the parole board he understood the gravity of his actions and was a changed man.

But, is he?

Yoko worries that Chapman might be a danger to her, other family members, and perhaps even himself.

Ms. Ono expressed these concerns at a Television Critics Association event this past week where she was originally invited to discuss an upcoming PBS Special on Lennon slated for broadcast in the fall.

The documentary takes a foray into the artistic life of Lennon in New York in the 1970s.

"LennonNYC" is scheduled to be air on Nov. 22nd as part of the "American Masters" public TV series and includes rare studio recordings, concert film out-takes and home movies.

According to producer Susan Lacy, Yoko generously provided access to archive material, and was also interviewed for the special.

For Yoko Ono, the ambitious project amounted to a golden opportunity to unmask the mystique of John - and thus - reveal warts-and-all what a three-dimensional person he actually was in the flesh.

The irony of the NYC connection did not escape her.

For years, John fought U.S. Immigration Officials and the Department of Justice (who tried to barr his legal status in the U.S. because they deemed him an undesirable based on a much-publicized marijuana conviction) to remain in the U.S. and and set up a nest with Yoko in New York City.

Tragically, becoming a resident of the U.S., ended up cutting his life short unexpectedly.
It causes me to wonder now-and-then if it would behoove a sentient being to "let go" on occasion and allow the Lord's plan to unfold as it should.

It may save us from an early departure or impending disaster!





*I pine to take up residence in the Dakota!

Zsa Zsa Gabor...glam legend slated to exit hospital! Hilton wealth & playboy lovers!




Zsa Zsa a great beauty in her day!



Merv Griffin & Gabor sisters!
(minus 1)



Zsa Zsa Gabor - known for the slap that was heard around the world - is slated to pack up her wigs and make-up bag and purr home today in hubbie's luxury Rolls Royce after a nasty slip-and-fall sent her to the hospital last week for emergency medical care.

Uh-huh!

Though, a rumored 93, Ms. Gabor still manages to capture the imagination of the curious masses around the globe.

Within minutes, Ms. Gabor was a trending topic on twitter, and the rumors and innuendo were in full swing.

Was she, like so many aging Hollywood legends, being held captive by unscrupulous jailors out to scoff up her jewels and rolls of Hollywood studio cash stashed away over the years?

Though basically a recluse - and boasting a Prince for a husband (often spied at Starbucks in WeHo ringside twiddling his thumbs over java) - many fond memories of Gabor's antics brought  a smile to the faces of many when the news broke.

"Oh, I remember Zsa Zsa from the Merv Griffen show. And, her sister, Eva," one local quipped to a bystander at Ralph's.

"She was the epitome of glamour," piped up another.

I met her on a movie set once in Hollywood and I recall that she was a swirl of fluffy boas and expensive baubles as she glided by with a posse of fussy handlers in tow.

When a Beverly Hills motorcycle cop pulled her over for a traffic violation a dozen or so years ago in the upscale enclave of Beverly Hills it was headline-grabbing news here and abroad; after all, Zsa Zsa was so incensed by his rude behaviour and reprehensible manners that she roundly slapped him across his handsome mustachioed face.

Many thought she should have maneuvered a date!

Suppose she would have been hauled into the slammer for attempted bribery, eh?

Merv, though scandalized a tad, appeared to applaud her ballsy bravado when she fluttered in to chat him up on the next talk show engagement.

The popular rotund talk show host - though rumored to be in an affair with sister Eva (a beard)  was just one of the girls who delighted in a bit of delightful gossip with the infectious Gabor sisters.

The fiery Hungarian was hailed as the first celebrity to be famous solely for her celebrity (thanks to Merv).

Sorry Paris, great auntie Zsa Zsa was light-years ahead of 'ya in that regard.

And, in recent years, Gabor has gained cult culture status for God-awful performances in old sci-fi low-budget thrillers that were plain CAMPY! CAMPY! CAMPY!

At one point, Liz Taylor was poised to become her step-daughter due to a couple of infamous trysts the two celebrated show-biz legends were scandalously involved in with male lovers that nearly hastened the odd-ball connection by virtue of star-crossed paths at the altar.

Zsa Zsa Gabor was born in 1917 (???)

"Probably," biographers have dubiously noted for the record.

The zaftig Gabor girls always did their best to confound the records (and snoopy folks who tried to fathom them) in order to conceal their ages (even their mother's reported date of birth varies by as much as five years give or take a decade or two).

As a young girl, Gabor may have competed in the Miss Hungary contest, or maybe not.

Years later, when Zsa Zsa swore up-and-down that her age was such-and-such, one astute guest nearby - with good arithmetic skills - jumped up and squawked that if that was the case she would have to have entered the infamous beauty contest she often spoke of when she was a nubile twelve or thirteen years of age!

At different times the three Gabor sisters have claimed to have won that pageant, or have been runners-up, with the same ensuing dilemma popping up to dash their efforts to remain younger than their years for reasons of vanity.

Age, lovers, and men have been a constant upset in Zsa Zsa's life to reckon with.

In 1937, Gabor married a Turkish foreign affairs minister considerably older than she was.

After she arrived in Turkey in the arms of her new beau, however, she alleged the marriage was never consumated in order to embark on a new romance with well-connected Kemal Ataturk - the President of Turkey - after she caught his eye.

Shortly thereafter, Gabor divorced her first husband in 1941 when she first arrived in America.

Conrad Hilton (Hilton Hotels) married Zsa Zsa in 1942 unaware that his young bride was a big spender who enjoyed the untold luxuries that life had to offer.

Her wanton excesses forced the Hotelier to place her on a $250-a-week budget which soured their marriage, according to their circle of friends at the time.

Before Conrad's daughter (Francesca) was born, Zsa Zsa had lost interest in the union.

So, when she crossed paths with actor George Sanders, she proceeded to set her sights on the rising star of stage and screen.

However, Gabor remained on 'amicable' terms with Conrad.

Smart gal!

In 1955,  he promised Zsa Zsa a special rate at all the Hilton hotels for the rest of her life, such a generous man was he.

After tying the knot with Sanders,  Zsa Zsa pined to be an actress.

In due time, she used her influential contacts to land small parts in low-budget films and on Television.

Zsa Zsa lucked out when she landed an important screen role in the 1951 film Moulin Rouge with Jose Ferrer.

However, film director John Huston allegedly kept Zsa Zsa on needles-and-pins when he persisted in constant humiliation tactics in front of the cast and crew, according to sources close to the actress.

Quirkier, more offbeat roles were offered up in 1950s, including a two episode stint on the popular TV show, Batman.

It wasn't below Zsa Zsa to play cameos as herself - which undoubtedly - led to her gathering fame over the years.

In spite of a long-lasting union with Sanders, Zsa Zsa was inclined to pursue a scandalous affair with a Dominican playboy by the name of Porfirio Rubirosa (known for his donkey dick among wealthy socialite ladies he teased and courted) in 1952.

Rubirosa's claim to fame (in addition to being well-hung) was a marriage to Woolworth heiress Barbara Hutton who was allegedly forced to pay princely sums in alimony when he packed his bags and left her for greener pastures.

In 1954, a black eye caused the rumor mill to speculate that the celebrated polo player beat Zsa Zsa, and was the event that triggered their eventual split as Internationally-known lovers.

To the bitter end, Gabor whispered to friends:

"He loves me."

The proud beauty explained it this way.

"Rubirosa in Spanish means red rose, for me it means black eye. A man only hits a woman if he loves her deeply."

Maybe folks will have some sympathy for Mel Gibson after all, eh?


Barbara Hutton
(Woolworth heiress)


Michael Phelps...Golden Boy nabs 100 fly in record time @ U.S.Championships! Glide to 50th win!







Michael Phelps - still the most exciting swim athlete to keep an eye on in this or any other relevant swim competition now or in the future - glided to an easy powerful win in the 100 meter Butterfly on Thursday at the U.S. Championships in tony Irvine (CA).

The multi-Olympic champion stroked to the finish line in excellent form - and a heady victory - to nab his 50th United States National swimming title.

Earlier in the week, in spite of two exciting wins (200 meter freestyle & 200 meter Butterfly), Phelps grumbled about his physical performance (the kid wasn't too happy about his timing, either) but was all smiles today as he spun himself up out of the pool with a satisfied look on his handsome chiselled face.

200 Meter Freestyle

Post: 08/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/08/though-he-wasnt-pleased-with-speed-he.html

200 Meter Butterfly

Post: 08/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/08/michael-phelpswins-butterfly.html

There was much to be overjoyed about (fans were ecstatic) after having shaved off a second of the previous world best time of 51.70 set by Evgeny Korotyshkin at the Russian Nationals in May.

Phelps's time of 50.65 seconds was the fastest in the world this year.

A man of few words, who tends to downplay his performance, the "Golden Boy" of the U.S. Swim circuit managed a few words for the press that signaled he was happy - a smidgent, at least - overall at long last.

"I'm fairly pleased with that," Phelps said.

"That's pretty good for right now. That's the best I've felt."

A bit cocky?

The win gave Phelps his 50th National title, the most all time.

Auburn's Tyler McGill confidently hit the wall behind him in second place with a so-so time of 52.20.

Ohio State's Tim Phillips came in a respectable third with a clock that read at 52.41.

With two races to go in the U.S. Championships in the month ahead, Phelps has turned a stellar page in his swim career on the American scene, for sure.

Without doubt, unpleasant personal missteps he struggled over last year (especially in respect to image) are fading into the past.

Just maybe, there's a product endorsement or two on the horizon, to propel his greatness forward once again.

News at 11.


Thursday, August 5, 2010

Newt Gingrich...blasts that Prop 8 Judge Walker is un-American! Kagan unlikely to vote his way!




Gingrich carries big stick!
(casts small shadow)







Newt Gingrich was on the rag today over the landmark ruling handed down yesterday by U.S. Federal District Court Judge Vaughn Walker who effectively overturned the ban on same-sex marriage in the State of California with a flourish of a pen.

In a bald-faced tirade, spewed across his infamous website of hate, Gingrich labelled the Judge's actions downright "outrageous", for starters.

Then, he proceeded to rant that the jurist presiding over the legal proceedings in San Francisco displayed a total disrespect for the U.S. Constitution and for the majority of Americans whom - he asserted - have held firm in their belief that the institution of marriage is a holy union exclusive to heterosexuals.

Newt should take a vicodin and call it a day!

After all, he needs to get his facts straight.

For example, the outspoken politician falsely alleged that in every State - from California to Maine to Georgia (where people have had a chance to vote) - Americans have affirmed that marriage is strictly a privilege afforded one man and one woman.

Newt, same-sex marriages are currently legal in Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and Washington.

A majority of folks here-and-there appear to disagree, so wake up and smell the coffee.

Of course, anyone with an ounce of intelligence is keen to the fact that Newt Gingrich doesn't have much of a clue about the pulse of the American people anyway - beyond his own polluted little pond - much less in Washington or elsewhere.

But - the notion that Congress should rush in - was a real hoot.

"Congress now has the responsibility to act immediately to reaffirm marriage as a union of one man and one woman as our National policy," he keyed into a post angrily.

On the contrary, the issues pertaining to same-sex marriage must go on through the legal process, and a determination has to be made, according to the law of the land.

Judge Walker was just interpreting applicable Statutes to the best of his ability.

What do they say?

Don't shoot me! I'm just the messenger!

Justices in the higher court(s) will - undoubtedly - endeavour to do the same (now that an appeal has been filed with the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals) until the issue sputters to a logical conclusion.

When it comes to President Obama and Congress drumming up a "National Policy"?

Don't hold your breath, Newt!

Obama and his flat-footed cronies have yet to craft a meaningful Immigration Reform Bill - in spite of a loud outcry and violent protests - that has been tearing apart the country in recent weeks.

But, Newt's misguided lunacy doesn't stop there.

In a parting shot, he piped up:

"Today’s notorious decision also underscores the importance of the Senate vote tomorrow on the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court because judges who oppose the American people are a growing threat to our society.”
 
OMG!
 
Does't he read the newspapers?
 
Essentially, Kagan was being touted as a shoe-in for confirmation.
 
Notwithstanding, is he really that much of an a**hole that he actually believes that anyone who disagrees with his point of view (Elena Kagan & Judge Walker) must be anti-American?
 
The man needs therapy!

 
 
 
Kagan un-American?
(or just out-of-fashion)
 

Star Trek Convention...lands @ Hilton in Vegas! 4 a fan-extravaganza! Shatner to appear!








Fans of Science Fiction are kicking up their heels and spiraling ecstatically out-of-control with sensory overload at the annual Star Trek Convention currently underway at the Hilton Hotel in Las Vegas.

Over 15,000 fans from all over the Universe joined in last year for a non-stop four days of fun which were highlighted by on-stage appearances, partying, autographing and photo ops with 70 great Trek celebrities that appeared in either the original TV series or the big screen versions of the tales of Captain Kirk adapted for the theatre-going public.

Guest Stars expected to mingle with ticket-holders this year include William Shatner (Captain Kirk) and Leonard Nimoy (Spock), Sir Patrick Stewart, Brent Spiner, Eugene "Rod" Roddenberry, Jr., Jonathan Frakes, and a galaxy of many more stars!

In keeping with the Star Trek tradition, there will be a number of  giant vendors rooms, auctions, incredible musical and comedy performances by Star Trek celebrities, costume and trivia contests, and parties to die-for.

Here is a sampling of panel discussions where fans may mingle with their favorites.

EXCLUSIVE STAR TREK PANELS

*George & Walter Together Again: Classic Star Trek (Thursday)
*The Guest Stars of Classic Star Trek: 2 events (Thursday)
*Next Generation Guests Harry Groener, Jerry Hardin (Thursday)
*The DS9 Promenade Panel with James Darren (Friday)
*DS9 Dominion Panel with Casey Biggs (Friday)
*Voyager Reunion with Garrett Wang (Saturday)
*William Shatner & Leonard Nimoy Live! (Saturday)
* Sir Patrick Stuart & Brent Spiner (Sunday)
*Enterprise Boys: Connor Trinneer (Sunday).
*The Children Shall Lead" (Sunday).

CELEBRITY BINGO

Friday Night
(7:15 PM to 8:30 PM)

Celebrity Bingo is one of the most talked about super-fun events of the convention where fans from around the world party-hearty as they are treated to delicious finger foods and a complimentary glass of champagne (or apple cider).

Fast paced games offer up tons of valuable STAR TREK goodies which include rare signed collectibles.

Thousands of dollars of novel Star Trek prizes are also up for grabs.

Famous celebrity bingo callers are expected to appear at the sold-out event.

See 'ya there!

Info: http://www.startrek.com








Propositiion 8..."Protect Marriage" files appeal to 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal!








As expected - at least one party in the tustle over Prop 8 and the gay-marriage ban in California - would end up lodging an appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the the heels of the ruling handed down by U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker.

In view of a court's finding yesterday - in a controversial 138-page ruling that essentially found that Prop 8 was unconstitutional - supporters of the Prop 8 ballot initiative (backed by California voters) found themeselves hot-footing it down to the Federal Courthouse overnight to protect their vested interest in opposite-sex marriage and family values.

Background

Post: 08/05/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/08/proposition-8judge-overurns-ban-on-gay.html

In a nutshell, opponents to gay-marriage must now convince a higher court that District Court Judge Vaughn Walker erred as a matter of law when he  ruled that Proposition 8 violated Federal Equal Protection and Due Process Laws.

In spite of the fact the 9th Circuit court has no specified deadlines to be mindful of in respect to a review of the issues ripe for appeal, the supporters of Prop 8 and oppositie-sex marriages proceeded to file their deliberate "Notice of Appeal" with the court (based in the San Francisco Bay area) post haste.

The appeal will be randomly assigned to a three-judge panel with little brouhaha.

In accordance with Appellate Court Rules of Procedure, each party in the action will be required to lodge a brief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - at which point - a date will be set by the Court clerk for an oral hearing so that the issues may be clarified further to the satisfaction of the Justices presiding over the proceedings.

A disgruntled party - unhappy with the 9th Circuit Court ruling thereafter - will be entitled to launch  an appeal with the highest court in the land after that which is the  U.S. Supreme Court in Washington (D.C.).

However, the 9 sitting Justices are not required to "hear' the appeal.

A petition for a hearing on the issues may be denied by the court without explanation - at which point - the lower court ruling becomes binding (law).

The Prop 8 supporters are going to give it their best shot, though.

"This ruling, if allowed to stand, threatens not only Prop 8 in California but the laws in 45 other states that define marriage as one man and one woman," said Brian Brown, the Prresident of the National Organization for Marriage, which helped fund the 2008 campaign that led to the gay marriage ban.

Currently, same-sex couples can only legally wed in Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and Washington, D.C.

The appeal to the 9th Circuit filed on the heels of Walker's landmark ruling, was lodged by Protect Marriage, which is a coalition of religious and conservative groups that sponsored Proposition 8.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown wisely chose to watch from the sidelines and remain out of the fray.


Proposition 8...Judge overturns ban on gay marriage! Well-thought out legal argument...






In a landmark ruling on the issue of same-sex marriage, Federal Judge Vaughn Walker overturned Proposition 8 yesterday, on the grounds that the California ballot initiative was essentially unconstitutional in nature.

In his 136-page ruling, which sent shock waves around the country - and in the sacred environs of the legal system far-and-wide - Walker argued that the State had no legitimate interest in treating gay and lesbian couples differently than their heterosexual counterparts.

Standing alone, "Moral disapproval' -  he wrote in his well-thought-out opinion - was not sufficient cause to uphold Proposition 8.

Previous court decisions have established that marriage is a fundamental right that cannot be denied to people without a compelling rationale in support, Walker asserted in so many words.

Proposition 8 violated that right and discriminated on the basis of both sex and sexual orientation in violation of the equal protection clause, he found.

Unlike like other court rulings on the issue of gay marriage that have relied on State Constitutions, Walker's ruling is the first to fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts.

Hence, the much-anticipated ruling is expected to worm its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the interim, Judge Walker stayed his ruling until at least Friday - at which point other pressing legal issues ("unfinished business") - might be addressed in respect to the gay marriage ban.

18,000 California couples were married when same-sex unions were legally allowed prior to the ban imposed by Proposition 8 and a voter majority in 2008.

The court may be inclined to make a determination at this time if California same-sex marriages may  commence once again now that Proposition 8 has been overturned or remain on hold pending potential appeals.

Judge Walker held extensive hearings - in January of this year - to determine if there was any reasonable basis for excluding gays and lesbians from tying the knot in an official capacity at City Hall alongside their heterosexual neighbours.

During the course of the proceedings, witnesses - who would have preferred to have remained anonymous to avoid retaliation from members of the community-at-large - tearfully asserted that the notion that children of opposite-sex couples fared better - mind, body, and soul - (according to opponents of same-sex marriage)  were unsubstantiated, unfounded, and simply not true.

That argument appeared to resonate with the court, since Walker found that testimony by Proposition 8 supporters, failed to support that theory.

"The evidence shows conclusively that moral and religious views form the only basis for a belief that same-sex couples are different from opposite-sex couples," Walker wrote.

Andy Pugo, an attorney in support of Prop 8, lamented Walker's findings and noted to all within earshot that the Federal District Court decision amounted to "an invalidation of the votes of 7 million Californians", "violated binding legal precedent", and "short-circuited the democratic process".

Pugo also hissed that it was "disturbing that the trial court, in order to strike down Prop. 8, has literally accused the majority of California voters of having ill will and discriminatory intent when casting their votes for Prop. 8."

Hogwash!

When common folks went  to the polls to vote on Prop 8, they were not keen to the legal issues that Pugo - a trained lawyer - argued came back to haunt them unjustly.

I expect their votes were passionate ones, triggered by their upbringing, religious beliefs, ignorance, and so-forth-and-so-on.

Some no doubt relied on a biblical passage that cautioned that homosexuality was an abomination in the eyes of God.

But, what evidence is there that those were - indeed - the words of the God?

Others joked - "God created "Adam and Eve" not "Adam and Steve" - when they took the position that marriage was reserved exclusively for heterosexuals on the grounds of pro-creation.

How many straight couples are "shacked up" around the State right now without any intention of having children?

And, how many individuals are in constant pursuit of sex, without the thought of marriage or bearing children in mind?

Andy Pugno, nonetheless, has taken the position that the Walker ruling will be overturned on appeal.

In retrospect, it appears that Walker - a male of gay persuasion - handled the legal proceedings wisely.

The lengthy, thorough trial proceedings - for instance - may prove to have been prudent under the circumstances.

Legal experts have underscored in the wake of the ruling - that higher courts generally defer to trial judges' rulings on factual questions that stem from a trial - although they still could determine that he was wrong on his interpretation of  the law.

Barry McDonald, a constitutional law professor at Pepperdine University, said Walker's findings that homosexuality is a biological status instead of a voluntary choice, that children don't suffer harm when raised by same-sex couples, and that Proposition 8 was based primarily on irrational fear of homosexuality "are going to make it more difficult for appellate courts to overturn this court's ruling."

Nonetheless, there was an outcry in some quarters.

Edward E. (Ned) Dolejsi, the Executive Director of the California Catholic Conference, said he believed the judge's ruling was both legally and morally wrong.

"All public law and public policy is developed from some moral perspective, the morality that society judges is important," he protested.

"To say that society shouldn't base its laws on moral views is "hard to even comprehend," he whined.

Since Walker's ruling based on established law is sound, that leaves the issue of morality.

Only God can pass judgment on that!

Amen!




Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Michael Phelps...wins 200 Meter Butterfly! U.S. National Championships...








An hour after Michael Phelps won the 200 meter freestyle, he nabbed 1st place for the 200 meter butterfly @ the U.S. National Championships as well.

200 Meter Freestyle

Post: 08/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/08/though-he-wasnt-pleased-with-speed-he.html

Although Phelps was last off the blocks for the Butterfly stretch, he quickly zoomed ahead of his tough competitors, to hit the wall in 1:56:00. seconds flat.

The time was 4.49 seconds shy of the record he set at the World Championships in Rome last year.

In both races, Phelps "chopped" the pool walls, which was fodder to chew on in respect to his performance in upcoming competitions.

If fans were to believe Phelps, he floundered and flip-flopped throughout the race.

How does that make the losers feel, I wonder?

After noting that he didn't feel good at all, he stressed that it all boiled down to the "small" things.

"It's going to come back to being in shape."

Mark Dylla placed second, Tyler Clary third.

But, don't feel so bad, dudes!

Phelps hasn't lost the 200-meter fly since 2002.

If anything, the Butterfly stroke is a sort-of-a lucky charm for Michael.

Meanwhile, I would be remiss if I didn't mention that Aaron Peirsol earned a spot on the Pan Pacific team, alongside Golden boy Phelps.

Peirsol - a world record-holder in his own right - was upset in the 100 backstroke -  and lost to a 24-year old up-and-coming swimmer by the name of David Plummer (who hails from Minnetonka, Minnesota).

The win represented the first National title for Plummer.

"It makes me think I can be the best in the world one day and that's every swimmer's dream."



Michael Phelps...wins 200 meter freestyle in record time! U.S. National Championships...





Though he wasn't pleased with the speed that he was clocking, Michael Phelps managed to surge ahead of the pack early on in the 200-meter freestyle at the U.S. National championships, to win a coveted spot on the U.S. team for the Pan Pacific Championships next month.

The Olympic Gold medalist touched the wall in 1: 45.61 seconds flat - a record time (the fastest this year) - and in the process quickly dispelled rumors that he was an out-of-shape swimmer who just might fail poolside in the picturesque Souhern California town of Irvine this evening.

"Still slower than I want to be," the Olympic champion confided to all within earshot.

Ryan Lochte fought vigorously to best Phelps (he trailed close 'til the near-end of the race) - but eventually lost out to the celebrated Olympic Swimmer - to nab the No. 2 spot.

Lochte's numbers were nothing to sniff at either (1:47.78).

Peter Vanderkaay - a bronze medalist - boasted third place (1:46.84).

Congrats, Michael!



Proposition 8...News alert! Minutes ago Judge Vaughn Walker struck down the ban on gay marriage in California!






Just minutes ago - as tweeters watched (and participated) breathlessly on the twitter web site - it was announced that U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker issued a ruling that the Proposition 8 initiative approved by California Voters (2008) was unconstitutional.

Consequently, the ban on same-sex marriage has been overturned, in the State of California.

Background

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/08/prop-8us-district-court-to-rule-today.html

News at 11!




Prop 8...Tweeters say Judge Walker ruled initiative unconstitutional minutes ago!







Proposition 8 News Alert

Tweets are coming out that Judge Walker ruled Prop 8 Unconstitutional minutes ago.

True or false?

News at 11!


NEWS UPDATE
________________________________________________

True!
The Judge overturned Prop 8!

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/08/proposition-8news-alert-minutes-ago.html




Immigration & Customs Enforcement...arrests fashion counterfeiters! San Francisco raids...

Vera Wang designs vulnerable to counterfeits!




Shortly after Bill Clinton walked daughter Chelsea down the aisle on his arm at her high-profile wedding over the weekend in Rhinebeck (NY), local news anchors reported on the stunning wedding gown designed by leading fashion designer, Vera Wang.

In follow-up newsbites, young brides-to-be were invited to stay tuned, to learn how they could "whip" up the same pricey "look" for their own special occasion at the altar to fall within their budget constraints.

You betcha!

Right now, in back-door shops around the country, a host of dress designers are probably tossing together wedding gowns that echo the exquisite gown worn by Chelsea at a fraction of the cost.

It's called a "knock-off - and the practice of copy-catting - is a prevelant trend in the highly-competitive fashion industry.

But, when a clothing manufacturer steals a design outright and stamps it with a designer's label (without permission or license) - of Vera Wang, for example - that is a fraudulent act which prompts Law Enforcement to sit up and take notice.

In fact, on Tuesday, prosecutors announced that they just conducted a sweep and have charged operators of eight boutiques in the Bay area, for allegedly turning out designer fakes which were actually cut-and-seamed together in China.

According to the US attorney for Northern California and U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the twenty-five count indictment is part of the largest federal enforcement action ever taken against West Coast retailers suspected of selling counterfeit designer apparel and accessories.

And, the government takes these matters seriously for good reason.
.
"Trademark infringement and intellectual property crime not only cost this country much needed jobs and business revenues, but the illegal importation of substandard products can also pose a serious threat to consumers' health and safety," an official noted in a terse press release on the heels of the arrests.

The accused knock-off artists were charged with conspiracy, smuggling goods into the U.S., and trafficking in counterfeit (fake) goods.

"To consumers who think designer knock-offs are a harmless way to beat the system and get a great deal, 'buyer beware','" said ICE Director John Morton.

"The investigation has led to the seizure of nearly 100 million dollars worth of counterfeit merchandise [based on the manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) had the products been legitimate]," a statement said.

The luxury-brand fakes were packaged under known product names such as Prada, Louis Vuitton, Kate Spade, Nike, Armani, and Coach.

Tourists may have been hood-winked by the clever fakes that show up on retail shelves in the form of tony handbags, luxurious scarves, designer sunglasses, butter-smooth leather wallets, and snazzy eye-catching watches.



Prop 8...U.S. District Court to rule today! Decision to be appealed...






U.S. Distrcit Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker is expected to release his decision today on whether Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

The Court's decision is expected to be released this afternoon between 1 p.m. and 3 p.m.

Earlier this year - in January - Judge Walker heard testimony about the history of marriage, the nature of the homosexual lifestyle - and the influence of gays, lesbians and transgenders - in the political and social system in America today.


The trial lasted for approximately 3 weeks.

Either way, Walker's much-anticipated decision is expected to be appealed to the U. S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

After that, legal eagles speculate that the issues will probably go on to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final determination by Supreme Court Justices in Washington.

In May 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled 4 to 3 that gays and lesbians were entitled to marry under the State Constitution in what amounted to a landmark historic ruling.

A short while later - opponents to gay unions - drafted Proposition 8 to amend the State Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

California voters supported Prop 8 in the ensuing election thereafter.

In Bush v. Gore, a lawsuit challenged the initiative on the grounds of Constitutionality.

Walker will decide whether California’s ban on same-sex marriage violates equal protection and due process rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.



Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Lady Gaga...interrupts Phoenix concert to protest Arizona Immigration Reform!








NEWS ALERT!!!

Lady Gaga, turned the house on its ear in Phoenix tonight, when she interrupted her live! concert TO urge her "little monsters" to hold hands  - and unite together - to peaceably fight the landmark Arizona Immigration Reform Bill just passed into Law.

How will Lady Gaga fans (and music-lovers in general) react around the free world?

Do politics and eclectic music mix?

News at 11!




 
Custom Search