Saturday, July 10, 2010

Gold Spike...impotent Security Guard Brian Wills harasses Guests! Weasel lies to protect self!




Spike got a "face-lift" but ironically toilets still clog with shit!
(curb appeal on the cheap! cheap! cheap!)



Today, an impotent security guard - in a rinky-dink money suit - stepped into a heap-load of sh** when he harassed and discriminated against a guest in the Gold Spike Hotel in Las Vegas.

You know the type - a pig-headed loser who couldn't make the Police force dons a uniform with a gun packed in the holster to bolster his manhood - then proceeds to strut around like he has a big-swinging dick and the right to abuse the power vested in him by dim-witted Management at the Hotel who don't have a clue about the potenital liability of having a yahoo on the payroll.

A case in point.

Shortly after a guest exited the lobby for a jaunt over to the pool for a late-afternoon dip, a security guard by the name of - Brian Wills - stepped out of some bushes (!!!) and - in a threatening mean-spirited way - barked at the paying guest that he "couldn't go back there" (to the pool area).

Why, pray tell?

The lughead, with all the personality of a worm, didn't cite any reason - which infers from the get-go - that the Officer was openly discriminating on a whim.

Assholes, tend to do that, 'ya know?

Just maybe, he was jealous of the guest's cool shades?

Because the guest's lodging fees included use of the pool, Brian Wills' attempt to turn-back the individual, amounted to a denial of their right to access and privileges promised by the owners and management of the hotel when the room was booked (and paid for in full).

When the guest (aware that the Security Guard suffered from a low IQ) noticed that Wills was prone to over-step his bounds - and act out-of-line - he proceeded to politely inform the security guard that he was a registered guest at the Hotel.

The guard, realizing his fatal mistake, did a double-take in shock.

Ooops!

But, instead of taking the guest at his word (hadn't he eaten enough crow already?), he rudely demanded that the well-known celebrity guest show his key.

But, get this, the shocking misconduct persisted.

Instead of accepting the key as proof positive, he angrily asked for the suite number, after-the-fact.

Once again, the guest was able to provide the information at lightning speed - which would have satisfied any secruity guard - with an ounce of intelligence.

But the stupidity continued, when the slack-jawed bozo demanded the guest's name, too!

All efforts to block the guest's right to enter were snuffed out in one fell swoop by the intelligent, quick-thinking of the insightful guest - who had his number, just betcha - since the first moment the trigger-happy psycho's sorry carcass strolled onto the terrain.

But, the drama was far from over, as the wounded security guard emotionally-charged-up with anger and retaliatory thoughts swimming inside his ugly head, plottted to win at all cost to save face.

For instance, shortly after the guest arrived at the bar at the rear of the pool area, the security guard - who now appeared to be stalking him - appeared from behind and shouted in a loud voice so the poolside revellers  in the immediate vicinity could hear:

"You've got shit on the back of  your pants. You have to go clean up."

Talk about rude and insulting.

If you ask me, the security guard's defamatory remarks, are sufficient grounds for compensatory and punitive damages in a local Civil Court.

That's what happens when a Hotel hires a piece of white trash without one well-mannered, educated, or classy bone, in their entire fat frame.

Notwithstanding, some of bizarre conduct, begs an obvious question.

Why was Brian Wills checking out the guest's ass?

Secondly, the allegation was ridiculous.

The fashion-savvy guest was wearing acid-dyed jeans - a fabric design idea - that often creates "patches" of discoloration on the surface (and even the interior) of the garment.

What an idiot!

I expect he wears fruit-of-the-lumes with urine stains on the crotch!

The wild accusation was just an outrageous shoddy ploy to embarrass and humiliate the guest in front of a patio packed with revellers who were now gazing on in shock and disbelief.

At this point, Wills had the audacity to shout at the guest:

"Go get yourself cleaned up or change your pants."

In view of the fact other guests were in - shorts, flimsy-bikini-briefs, and an odd-assortment of fashions current and out-of-favor- the notion that the guest should change his pants for a security guard who didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground was an absurd notion.

Because the allegations were confusing - and bizarre - the guest went up to their room to take a backward's glance at the "ass" of the slacks in the mirror to fathom what the fuss was all about.

Nothing out of the unusual.

As aforementioned, some blotched areas - on the jeans when they were originally purchased - were subtly noticeable as usual.

At this juncture, the guest tried an experiment.

He splashed water on the area the guard complained about - but, no sir - the patters ingrained in the jeans were not about to "wash out" so easily.

The guest proceeded to Video-tape the jeans so there would be evidence to support his claims in the event a lawsuit is filed for damages.

So there, Wills!

Obviously, the demented guard - with poor sight, perhaps? - jumped-the-gun and came to the wrong conclusion.

Or, was he just desperately trying to find an excuse, in a deceitful effort to try to substantiate his outrageous conduct - and ultimately - "weasle" out of his gross error in judgment?

When the guest stopped down at the front desk to file a complaint with the Supervisor, the rogue Security Guard trotted up - got in the victim's face - and tried to bully him further.

In no uncertain terms, the guest reiterated in front of witnesses standing in the lobby, that Officer Brian Wills decided at first glance that the guest "did not belong" there and - contrary to the guard's false statements - tried to deny him access "because he had the authority" (but no legitimate cause) to do so.

The officer engaged in the discriminatory conduct before he even "checked-out" the guest's ass.

A pretty, firm one, if 'ya ask moi!

Maybe the guest should file a formal complaint for sexual harrassment and stalking against that security guard?

After all, judging by what I witnessed, that Brian Wills is a perverted demented piece of work.

At this point, the supervisor instructed Mr. Wills to back off, so he could have a meaningful discussion about the disturbing incident without interruption, in order to properly address the sick behaviour of the security guard who obviously needs therapy.

Frankly, in my estimation, Brian Wills poses a threat to the guests and the casino-going throngs as well who frequent the Spike.

"Rotundo" (the guard in charge that evening) apologized - extended his hand - and tried to calm the waters.

However, it was pretty obvious that he was anxious for the incident to go no farther.

Golly, wonder why?

Unfortunately for the guard, the guest requested a complaint form so that a full investigation could be pursued with vigor.

Officer Brian Wills, after all, demonstrated today that he lacks sound judgment, abuses his power, openly provokes and harasses hotel guests without povocation at whim, and - in the final analysis - has a sick  meanstreak that not only makes him unfit for the job but in emergency need of psychological counselling.

He's a loose cannon about to go off!

Personally, I was flabberghasted by what went down, especially in view of the fact the individual in question was a well-known celebrity around the globe!

Does Brian Wills have his head so far up his sloppy butt-hole, that he doesn't know what's going on in celebrity-filled Vegas on a daily basis all around him?

Las Vegas residents and businesses have been moaning and groaning about a lack of business in recent days.

No wonder, Brian Wills and his merry gang of thugs are scaring them all away.

A pleasant-young desk clerk (by the name of "Tara") - who expressed dismay and sorrow over the unfortunate incident - assured the guest that if he dropped by the office the following morning that the Hotel Manager would not only lend a sympathetic ear - but also - take swift appropriate action against Brian Wills for his misconduct, wrongful discriminatory acts, and open harassment of the guest in Violation of his rights.

Ironically, just this morning, I posted a glowing review of the Spike Hotel, encouraging guests to book into this boutique-style gem.

Post: 07/10/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/gold-spikevegas-update-affordable.html

Now, I have to take pause to consider one glaring truth.

Until Officer Brian Wills is removed from Security Guard detail at the Spike Hotel, perhaps guests intending to book a room in the near future, should move on to lodging where security guards have taken an oath to protect and keep safe guests and not discriminate, harass, and violate their rights as Officer Brian Wills is inclined to do.

News at 11!




 


Brian Wills attended rinky-dink Security Guard School!


CoAmerica...Mastercard for SSI direct deposit leaves Seniors stranded!







For many, it was a good idea.

The Government teamed up with CoAmerica bank to provide a direct deposit account for monthly SSI Benefits in tandem with a Mastercard debit (?) card to access the funds.

For Seniors with bad credit - who do not meet the criteria for a credit card - it was a Godsend in many respects.

Unfortunately, who ever set up the access criteria to tap the funds, must have had sh** for brains!

After all, the "Direct Express" Mastercard is not always a reliable way to withdraw funds in a Senior's hour of need.

For example, if the individual attempts to purchase gas at a pump owned-and-operated by key brands who do not recognize the CoAmerica "system", they will be SOL!

The anxiety-ridden motorist will have to scurry down the highway to locate a gas station that welcomes the CoAmerica Mastercard.

At a regular ATM, the account-holder must access the "checking" option, to get their hands on the moolah.

But, guess what?

The Senior is barred from writing a check because - for unknown intents-and-purposes - the account was not set up that way.

On occasion, a card-holder will be forced to face undue embarrassment at a handful of  establishments (usually in front of a long line of impatient customers gazing on suspiciously) when the clerk swipes the card and retorts in a loud voice that booms across the room.

"Your card was denied."

As customers roll their eyes in line, the senior wants to crawl under the carpet, or snatch up the card and dash out the nearest exit.

After all, no excuse, will be taken seriously.

"The system at my bank must be down," the individual protests.

"Uh-huh," the cashier mutters back in disgust not buying a word of it.

If a traveller books (and pays for) a Hotel suite online - and the card is processed - you'd think that at the front desk at check-in time the card would also allow for a deposit to be placed on the account.

Not always!

On occasion, guests have been forced to dash off to find an ATM - and a fistful of cash - to secure their room.

But, that may not solve the problem.

Many Hotels won't accept cash deposits!

What a dilemma.
A Senior's account has been charged for a two-or-three-day Hotel stay - but they may be tossed out on their butts - because they can't produce a piece of plastic to secure incidentals incurred during the course of the vacation stay.

Hence, the reason I am posting this disclosure about CoAmerica's Direct Deposit Mastercard.

I trust that throwing a spotlight on the glitch may accomplish one or two things:

(1) Prompt a fix so Seniors don't get stranded in the future.

(2) Create wider awareness among Merchants about the card limitations.

Bottom line?

Seniors deserve better treatment and more respect.



Carl's Jr....sign jutting into street a hazard to pedestrians!






Shortly after carrying out a couple of chores bright-and-early this morning, I was strolling along the Vegas strip, when - BAM! - it suddenly felt like someone punched me in the forehead with a two-ton Jack hammer!

For a second, I blacked out.

Then, in the next, I managed to hold my balance precariously as I tried to prevent my body from falling backwards off the heels of my wobbling feet.

When my eyes fluttered open a second or two later, I caught sight of the culprit, that delivered the nasty blow.

Imagine that!

I walked into a sign for a Carl's Jr. fast-food  joint - crafted in metal - which was jutting out into the pedestrian walkway (and hanging low).

Ouch!

At this juncture, I was forced to return to my Hotel, to search for an ice pack and a quiet place to plunk myself down to alleviate a splitting headache that was now starting to throb at the front of my skull.

Let's hope I don't have a concussion!

One complication I don't need in my life just now.

Carl, move that sign out of harm's way, please!


Gold Spike...Vegas update! Affordable lodging with character...



Artists's Rendering

 



The last time I booked into the Gold Spike (Siegel Suites) the low-key Hotel was being refurbished.

Nonetheless, in spite of side-stepping a construction-worker or two, my brief stop-over as a guest was quite a spoil.

Readers of the Tattler may recall I was quite the happy little camper once I strode through the door and found myself firmly ensconced in the Penthouse suite!

Post: 10/20/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/las-vegasbugsy-siegel-suites-spike-good.html

Currently,  the little gem - just off Freemont Street - is up-and-running to full capacity.

And, there is a lot for Management to shout about.

The entrance boasts a pretty terrace which is quite inviting to the weary traveller aching to find a little respite from it all.

And, since my last visit, the owners have renovated - and incorporated into the lodging mix - a property they purchased just adjacent which benefits Gold Spike guests.

A glittering pool, cabana-style, awaits guests keen on stretching out under the sun to catch a few rays on a lazy off-day or two.

At night under a canopy of stars and full moon - the aesthetically-pleasing terraced area - is a soothing sight that nurtures the soul.

The pool is "multi-level" and features a couple of water fountains that kids (adults, too) love to splash in, for starters.

A white theme - used throughout in the armchairs and pretty umbrellas that top a dozen-or-so tables scattered about - add a touch of class that appeals to the senses.

The canvas curtains adorning the railings on the upper and lower levels of the Hotel walkway add an old-world charm to the impecably clean space.

The rooms are decorated with flair - quite spacious - and feature quite a few amenities.

And, guess what?

The rates are resonable, too!

See 'ya there.

Love...quote!







Friendship is fleeting
Love is eternal


Julian Ayrs
Divine Grace
Collection of Poems



Friday, July 9, 2010

Canyon Buster...never again! Circus Circus Vegas ride packs a whallop!







As part of a "coupon" package I received during my stay at Circus Circus, a free ticket was offered up for the Canyon Buster thrill ride in the Hotel's Adventuredome.

Over the years, I've been to a number of theme parks - actually appeared on stage live as a performer at a couple of 'em during the summer holidays - so the modified "roller coaster" didn't appear to be that ominous or scary-looking.

Wrong!

The ride started off calmly enough.

As excited thrill-seeking teens held on tightly to the rail, the car slowly crawled to the top of a steep perch - during which time - they were able to drink up  a spectacular view of the Vegas skyline through a glass dome.

Suddenly, without warning, the cab jolted forward - then - leapt  down a startlingly deep decline - which prompted the amusement park attendees to shriek out at the top of the lungs in sheer terror as their pounding  hearts literally jumped out of their chests!

But, that was just the beginning!

In a short span of time the  riders were sent headlong down a track that jolted this way 'n that to the left and to the right (at times the paid charges were nearly spilled right out of their flimsy-seats) as they hung on for dear life.

OMG!

Just when I thought the roller coaster ride was slowing down and about to ease into the end stall - there would be another jolting round of spurts - forward, down, to the side, and up again.

The unique attraction features two six-car trains that seat four passengers in two rows per car.

Though tightly secured inside, the Canyon Buster's back-to-back vertical loops and corkscrews sent me reeling, alright.

No wonder!

The helix inside the mountain takes up a expansive portion of the park to great advantage.

The "Buster" has been touted as the worlds largest indoor double-loop double-corkscrew coaster.

And worth every cent paid up-front to experience the adrenalin-rushing  adventure under the fun-filled sun-drenched dome.

Never again, though.

The old ticker can't take it!




Big splash on Rim Runner!

Thursday, July 8, 2010

62nd Annual Emmy Awards...Glee nabs 19 nominations! Jimmy Fallon to host...





Am I pretty enough?




Officials in charge of the 62nd Primetime Emmy Awards announced bright-and-early today that quirky "Glee" earned 19 Emmy nominations - then - moved on to toss the spotlight on a roster of shows that also rustled up deserving nods for excellence in the Television medium.

"The Pacific" - an  HBO miniseries about Marines in World War II's Pacific theater - topped all candidates in-the-running with 24 nominations.

"The Good Wife" - starring Julianna Margulies - nabbed kudos for best drama and best actress in a drama series.

"Modern Family" (best comedy series) snapped up 14 nominations.

To no one's surprise - "Friday Night Lights" cast (Kyle Chandler & Connie Britton) earned acting nods for their work on the much-touted series.

A perennial favorite - "Saturday Night Live" (in its 35th season) - earned 12 nods.

The hilarious late-night bill-of-fare still has strong legs, eh?

NBC must have been kicking themselves when it was announced that Conan O'Brien's "Tonight Show" was nominated for best variety, music or comedy series.

Curiously, Jay Leno and David Letterman were shut out of the category.

Dirty show-biz politics behind-the-scenes playing a role here?

"Lost" - though cancelled - managed to still earn a nom for best drama series and best actor in a drama (Matthew Fox).

Terry O'Quinn and Michael Emerson got supporting-lead nods.

 "Breaking Bad," "Dexter," "Mad Men" and "True Blood" won approval in the best drama category.

 In total - "Mad Men" - racked up a stunning 17 nominations.

"Curb Your Enthusiasm," "Nurse Jackie," "The Office" and "30 Rock",  "Glee" and "Modern Family" were named best comedy series nominees.

"Monk"  picked up a comedy series best actor nomination for star Tony Shalhoub.

"The Amazing Race" - which has won the best reality competition Emmy since the category was first introduced years ago - was lumped in with other nominees once again alongside "American Idol," "Dancing With the Stars," "Project Runway" and "Top Chef".

Two Made-for-TV movies - "Temple Grandin" and "You Don't Know Jack" - ended up in the spotlight as well.

Claire Danes got a notice for her role in "Temple Grandin".

Al Pacino was lauded for his portrayal of Dr. Jack Kevorkian.
 (You Don't Know Jack)

HBO led the network pack with 101 nominations.

ABC nudged in the lead with 63 nods in the broadcast TV arena.

Emmy fans are looking forward to a high-profile celebration with Jimmy Fallon at the helm on August 29th (NBC) which will be telecast live from the Nokia center in downtown Los Angeles.

See 'ya there!

President Obama..speaks at Aria in Vegas today! Lodges @ Caesar's Palace...

Prez will speak at Aria!




The theme of the speech?



President Obama will touch down in Vegas with a bit of controversy nipping at his heels.

For starters, the Governor will not be greeting the Commander-in-Chief when he alights onto the tarmac late this afternoon.

Although some have tittered that the State's Chief Honcho is snubbing the President because he is still pi**ed over remarks Obama uttered up last year that resulted in a mammoth loss of business to the desert Oasis's Convention business - the Governor's handlers swear up-and-down that scheduling conflicts are the reason for the failure to bow down.
Also, some are grumbling that during a stellar  week of  Tourism - operators of aerial sight-seeing tours conducted by helicopter - may lose up to a half-a-million dollars in revenue over the next twenty-four hours because the flights have been restricted above Las Vegas pending the arrival and departure of the President's carrier.

Ouch!

The President is in town to rally and raise funds for Harry Reid.

In addition, Barack Obama is scheduled to give a prepared speech at Aria around the dinner hour.

But, get this!

Instead of hunkering down at CityCenter's crown jewel, the President has elected to takelodging a hop-and-a-skip away at Caesar's Palace.

Maybe the administration is taking a cue from the Queen (Elizabeth II, silly!) and being budget-minded this trip?

Or, perhaps Caesar's is more suitable digs for an "Emperor" of Obama's ilk?

Just maybe, he's hopped up over the idea of taking in a glitzy Vegas show!

News at 11.




Obama has a thing about Imperialist flourishes!


Chief Tony Almaraz...deceitful illegal conduct @ Nevada Highwway Patrol! Stalling & delaying tactics frustrate Citizen rights!





A few days ago, I reported on the misconduct of Officer Del Padre, a trooper in the employ of the Nevada Highway Patrol.

The rogue Officer - Del Padre (Badge # 691) - stopped a motorist without the appropriate authority (legal grounds) to do so , harassed the disabled individual on the side of Highway I-15 (Las Vegas), attempted to destroy evidence that would incriminate himself, then proceeded to illegally seize the motorist's vehicle.

Post: 07/05/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

Post: 07/06/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-immigration-lawnevada-highway.html

I immediately lodged a formal complaint with Highway Patrol Chief -Tony Almaraz - by e-mail communicaton that afternoon.

Because of the long week-end, I did not receive any word back right away, presumably because Almaraz's office was closed for the 3 days in question.

However, I was encouraged that there may be a quick resolution to the problems outlined in my complaint, when Mr. Almaraz's office responded to my e-mail complaint Tuesday morning after the holiday with a promise to investigate and get back to me.

Three days later, there was no word "back" from Mr. Almaraz, so I was forced to zip off a second e-mail to ask for an update on the investigation since the motorist I filed the complaint on behalf of was starting to suffer damages from Officer Del Padre's wrongful illegal conduct on the side of the highway a few days earlier.

For example, the disabled motorist was stranded with no transportation and little cash in Las Vegas.

In addition, the stress and strain of the ordeal, was starting to cause undue physical, emotonal, and financial hardship to the motorist.

The situation became urgent, subsequently.

In spite of informing Chief Almarez of these disturbing turn-of-events - so that he could grasp the seriousness of the situation which was escalating by the hour - the Nevada Highway Patrol officer entrusted to look out for Public Safety in his capacity as head of the agency has failed to respond.

In addition, it should be noted, that my request for the name and contact e-mail (or physical address) of Internal Affairs has also been ignored.

Was Chief Almaraz's intitial response just a public relations ploy?

Surely, if the man had an ounce of decency (or compassion), he'd take prompt swift action to rectify the wrongs committed due to the illegal conduct of his Officer (Del Padre / Badge No. 691)?

Or, is his stalling and delaying - a clear-cut signal - that he is bent on engaging in a conspiracy to protect his officer - and ultimately - the name and reputation of his Law Enforcement Agency?

After all, my request was simple and straightforward, and does not require a lot of intelligence to carry out.

For example, in my complaint, I demanded that the Nevada Highway Patrol:

1. Waive the towing & storage fees since the seizure was illegal.
2. Release the vehicle to the motorist.
2. Issue an apology.

How difficult a task is that to fulfill?

It should be noted that at the Nevada Highway Patrol web site, the agency has posted a glowing tribute for Chief Tony Almaraz, with a flattering run-down on his alleged past achievements.

It should be noted that the profile states that in November of 2008, Almaraz was assigned to the Department of Public Safety / Nevada Highway Patrol Headquarters, where he was responsible for personnel, budgets and managed issues with the Legislative Counsel Bureau.

That credit alone tends to infer that he should be capable of resolving this complaint issue in a snap.

On the heels of that assignment, he was installed as Chief of the Nevada Highway Patrol.

Evidently,  Almaraz has the power & authority to resolve the complaint.

So, why has Chief Almaraz been dragging his feet, and neglecting his duty to rectify the wrongs inflicted on an innocent citizen, by a corrupt cop who is an obvious threat to the community-at-large?

Maybe the Department of Justice or the FBI can toss some light on that question!



Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Al Gore...Police report reads like Porn novel. An Inconvenient truth...

Well, allegation of tongue-kiss, may not be far off!



When I speculated a couple of weeks ago that the break-up between Al Gore and his long-time childhood sweetheart may have been triggered by events which thus far escaped the glare of the public spotlight - I hit the jackpot -  alright! 

Background:

Post:  07/05/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/al-goregroping-investigation-where.html

Post: 06/01/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/06/al-goreand-wife-tipper-to-separate.html

Post: 06/02/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/06/al-goredated-without-tippers-knowledge.html

In the past few days, sordid details of the alleged groping incident have been released to the press, and the tawdry tale reads like a cheap dime-store novel!

The 73-page tome details with no-holds barred the brief encounter between a hire-by-the-hour massage therapist (I use the term loosely) and the former Vice President who was referred to Hotel Staff as a "special guest".

If the enterprising babe was intrigued at idea of gleaning the identity of the mysterious traveller from the front-desk register, she was SOL!

Al Gore booked into his suite under an assumed name.

Mr. Stone!

A pebble for your thoughts, folks.

According to the police report, Mr. Gore greeted the stranger at the entrance of the suite, with a long lingering embrace.

"I was a bit taken aback by it," the masseuse blurted to the police in charge of the investigation.

Why did she not recoil in disgust?

Allegedly, the Hotel informed her prior to the session, that the individual scheduled for the massage was a VIP.

"A powerful man," they stressed.

So, the Hotel Lucia was giving him the Royal Treatment, according to sources.

Dollar signs must have been floating inside that conniving head of hers, because she proceeded to not only "service" Al Gore, but take note of all the salacious details for future posterity.

For example, the muscle-soother noted to investigators right off-the-bat that Gore instructed her to massage the inside of the thighs.

"I mentally noted that a request for adductor work is a bit unusual because it can be a percursor to inappropriate behaviour by a male client."

At his insistence, her hands fluttered up to his stomach to work the muscles in that region - at which point - Bill Clinton's former second-hand man  began to moan!

At this juncture, the masseuse sauntered into more turbulent waters.

Gore instructed her to massage farther down.

 "Go lower," he demanded.

When the clever gal chose a "safe non-sexual" area of muscle, Gore not only reacted angrily - but - uttered up sharp loud verbal grunts.

She recalled that he grabbed her right hand, shoved it down under the sheet, and shouted:

 "There!"

At this point in the titillating tale, Police officers were no doubt all ears with a slight rise in their levi's.

The masseuse, as it turns out, had quite a flair for the dramatic too.

She alleged that Gore abruptly changed his tone all-of-a-sudden "as though he had switched personalities."

Then, he pleaded for release of his second chakra, according to the slightly-off miracle-worker.

"This was yet another euphenism for sexual activity," she insisted to Law Enforcement officials.

If you ask me, this woman is looney-tunes!

Also, it appears from the other allegations, that she is prone to read too much purple prose.

For example, at the tail-end of the session, she charged:

"(He) wrapped me in an inescapable embrace and caressed my back and buttocks (!) and breasts."

The long and short of it?

She alleges that she "tried to get away" but Gore was too strong for her.

So, she succumbed just like that?

Uh-huh.

Gore allegedly maneuvered her into the bedroom after that (with military-style precision?).

Then, he flipped her flat on her back and threw his whole body face down atop (!) of her.

Her choice of words is amazing, isn't it?

But the ordeal was not over.

"He pleaded, grabbed me, engulfed (!) me in embrace, tongue-kissed me, massage me, groped my breasts and rubbed himself against my crotch saying: "You know you want to do it".

And, not once, did she cry out for help!

Golly, Al Gore must be alot more mesmerizing that we all thought, eh?

As Columbo would say, just one more thing.

"Did he have a big dick?"

Inquiring minds want to know.


Hotel Lucia
(Portland, Oregon)


Lindsay Lohan...how much time in slammer? Celebrity Justice outcry...



Last Hurrah before heading off to the slammer





In the wake of the Lindsay Lohan sentencing-shocker, the tabloid talk shows roared into high gear last night, and attacked the issues from all fronts.

Even Danny Bonaduce - recovering alchie - jumped into the fray!

One “self-appointed” Judge on a court reality show, waved her gavel wildly into camera, and cackled that she was thrilled with the stiff penalties levied against the starlet for violating probation.

Another pundit - a bit of a boob - accused the Judge presiding over the case of actual reverse celebrity Justice.

“Because of who she was, the court threw the book at her to set an example,” he cynically quipped from the sidelines.

Panelists on the show scoffed and pooh-poohed the notion.

Generally, the consensus on the broadcast airwaves throughout the frenzied night was pretty uniform.

At this point, it may be appropriate to paraphrase a line from the popular popular Broadway Musical “Chicago“.

“She had it coming!”

“Without intervention, Lindsay may end up dead,” many speculated.

But, when it comes to the nitty-gritty, how much time will the spoiled little “Mean Girl” - with the tendency to spin out little white lies at lightning speed - spend in the slammer?

Because of severe overcrowding in the jails, Lindsay may be tossed out early, especially in view of the fact she was not guilty of any violent crimes (except against herself, perhaps).

A spokesperson for the County Jail hazarded a guess - that being a female inmate with a non-violent history - the once-perky starlet may end up suffering through just about one quarter of her sentence(s).

In addition, Lohan may receive credit for good behavior.

Lindsay, listen up!

If some diesel dyke tries to punch you in the pretty little face in the pokie, back off, pronto.

You don’t want to end up in the hole, do ‘ya?

And, don’t be tempted by in-house drug-pushers, who may try to throw a monkey-wrench into your plans for an early release.

The old axiom rings true here:

Misery loves company!

Nasty bitches!



Arizona Immigration Law...Justice Dept. attacks on its Face! Ass backwards maneuver!



Governor Brewer takes hard line!





True to their word, the Department of Justice followed through on their promise to file a Civil Lawsuit against the State of Arizona and Governor Brewer (in her official capacity) in a bold-faced effort to strike down a new Arizona Immigration Reform Law which has caused a lot of hysteria around the country in recent days.

In the body of their “slim” complaint, filed with the court yesterday, the Government asserted in no uncertain terms that Arizona Officials overstepped their bounds when they sought to enact a law that would grant sweeping powers to Law Enforcement in dealing with the troubling illegal immigrant problem in Arizona which has reached epic proportions.

The “Immigration Reform Law’ was originally denounced because critics alleged that it granted wide authority to Law Enforcement Officers that may lead to racial profiling - and ultimately - disturbing Civil Rights violations.

Specifically, the law would allow Police Officers to question a suspect about their legal status on a legitimate stop in traffic or on a public street if certain criteria raised red flags.

A directive stipulates that an officer may pursue a line of questioning regarding their right to be in the country, for example, if the individual is (i) combative for no good reason when stopped; (ii) wearing long sleeves on an intensely hot day; (iii) clearly out-of-place in the environment (and so forth and so on).

Just yesterday, President Obama underscored at a news conference that the Law has the “potential” for abuse.

Innocent Citizens may be victimized because of the color of their skin, for example.

Curiously, in spite of those concerns, the actual “complaint” does not make much mention of the racial profiling issue.

In fact, the main thrust of the argument rests on the “Supremacy Clause”.

The Government has essentially taken the stance that Arizona’s Immigration Reform Law seeks to usurp their power and intrude on their turf.

It is quite a conundrum, actually.

Ironically, the Government - in effect - has filed a suit against a Law that has not got into effect that was enacted because Washington was not doing its job enforcing legally-binding Immigration Laws currently in force.

It is not a slam dunk for the Government!

Lawyers for the Department of Justice have attacked the Law on its “face”.

The Government may be doing things ass backwards.

Normally, a law is enacted, and goes into efflect.

Once in force, when issues of Constitutionality arise - let’s say - legal action is taken to rectify the problem, strike down the law, etc.

Legal analysts argue that it would have been wiser for the Govrnment to wait until an incident warranted legal action.

At this juncture - a Judge may be inclined to rule:

"Let's see how it goes."

Then, dismiss without prejudice.

Arizona’s Governor maintains a hard line regarding the new Immigration Law.

The strong-willed politician takes the position that Arizona had no other alternativebut to take the action they did, because the Government was failing (neglecting?) to meet its responsibilities in enforcing border control, and ultimately, Immigration laws in general.

Contrary to the Government’s position on the matter, supporters of the Law in Arizona stress that their bill compliments U.S. Immigration Laws and does not in any way, shape, or form negatively impact them.




I already said my piece, so there!


Circus Circus...family value! Free rides for kids! Free drinks for parents!







Last year, I was forced to post a consumer alert when I uncovered a security problem at the Circus Circus Hotel on the strip in Las Vegas.

One eveing as I was waltzing along the hall to my room, I stopped at the door of the suite I thought I was booked into, and proceeded to insert the plastic computerized key into the slot.

Just as I spied the room number out of the corner of my eye - the door clicked, a green light flashed on - then, it swung wide open.

OMG!

My room key accessed the suite next door, no problem.

At this juncture, I thought I'd do my Civic duty, and inform the Hotel of the glitch so that the security risk could be resolved as quickly as possible.

When I strolled up to the Manager's desk, and informed a gruff hefty woman about the problem, she barely blinked.

"So, you want a new key for your suite," she huffed,  not the least bit phased by the security issue.

In fact, the way she acted, it appeared that this kind of slack programming of room keys was common at Circus Circus.

For this reason, I posted a consumer alert.

Post: 09/14/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/las-vegascircus-circus-security-problem.html

On a recent stay (I always give Hotels a second chance) it was quite evident that security is of utmost importance to the busy popular tourist attraction today.

For example, on one occasion I left the Hotel room door slightly ajar without closing it properly, because I was distracted by some personal possessions I was lugging into the suite.

A short while later, there was a knock on my door.

"Who is it," I cried out cautiously, since I wasn't expecting any guest(s).

Security!

Oh, golly.

Was my TV set blaring too loudly?

When I answered toward the door, I noticed for the first time that I neglected to shut it tight earlier.

"Your door is open," the guard pointed out, on the heels of my own observation.

I thanked him heartily, and he was on his way.

Uh-huh.

Patrols are on the ball at Circus Circus looking out for the guests.

In addition to the improved security, there are a few perks worthy of mentioning, for the budget-minded (at least).

Normally, flakey outfits in Vegas hand out useless coupons - sometimes booklets rife with them - that tend to be totally useless (basically, they have no value whatsoever and are a waste time pursuing).

Not so at Circus Circus.

When I handed in my coupon for an order of chips and salsa from a reputable grill downstairs - and proceeded to wander through the Casino floor munching on the tasty treat - I attracted a lot of attention.

One dude strode up and quizzed me about the tasty-looking snack.

"Where can I can some of those?"

When I wised him up, he dashed off  to grab his coupon book,  which he had tossed carelessly on the dresser in his Hotel suite.

In addition, I savored a couple of free well drinks on the house - too!

Also, tourists with kids will be pleased to hear  that there are coupons for free rides.

If you book during the week on Expedia, the room rates are pretty low, too.

So, for family road-trips, Circus Circus is a sure bet!

Although there is usually a long line snaking up at the check-in desk, the staff miraculously manage to zip through the processing at break-neck speed (unlike some of those other places).

Kudos!


Free rides at Circus Circus!



Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Lindsay Lohan...GUILTY! Star breaks down in Court! 90-days in slammer!





Loss of Innocence Hollywood-style!


A swarm of paparazzi excitedly jockeyed for position in front of a courthouse on a tony Beverly Hills street, a defense attorney committed a boo-boo when she inferred that the Judge may have been responsible for a misunderstanding that may have confused a teary-eyed starlet, and the world held its collective breath as the accused's fate was about to be determined by a no-nonesense Judge.

Uh-huh.

At two in the afternoon, when far-fetched soap operas were spewing  their wild yarns on local and National broadcasts, a real-life drama was unfolding in a court-room packed to the rafters with rapt observers hanging on every word uttered up during the proceedings.

Early on, there was a burp in the legal wranglings, when the court expressed its dismay about the fact one pertinent record - a detailed account of Lindsay Lohan's appearances at mandatory counselling sessions - was not available to peruse under close scrutiny.

For good reason, the Judge moved for a recess to rectify the problem.

I reported on this issue earlier in the day.

Post: 07/06/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/lindsay-lohanshuns-process-servers.html

When the proceedings continued a short while later, the court focused on the documents in minute detail.

In fact, an employee of the facility where Lindsay Lohan was enrolled to take the necessary classes to meet the terms of her probation, was called to the witness stand to clarify the issues.

After an exhausting sifting through of records, it was ultimately determined that Ms. Lohan had failed to appear at 7 out of the 27 scheduled classes.

Ms. Lohan's attorney noted that after probation was revoked and a warrant was issued, her client made a good-faith effort thereafter to catch up with her obligations, by attending two or three classes in one week instead of the one stipulated by the court.

At this juncture, Lohan's attorney made a big boo-boo (or under-estimated the Judge's intelligence and insight), when she blatantly inferred that the her Honor may have been responsible for the misunderstanding (if there was one) and the alleged failure to comply.

"In Chambers, I recall you requested one class a week to ensure the obligation was completed by July 15th," the defense lawyer asserted for the record in so many words.

On the contrary!

The Judge proceeded to note for the record that she stipulated once a week because it was her understanding from experts in the field that a subject benefitted best by attending classes regularly once (not two or three times) a week.

Ouch!

Lohan's attorney must have had wax in her ears, or something, because that statement by the Judge failed to register in her little noggin'.

Later, just prior to sentencing, the ditzy attorney reiterated that the Judge imposed the 1 week class schedule to meet a July 15th deadline date set by the court - and that in view of that - her client was not in non-compliance.

Then, the attorney made the wildest comment of all.

"As of this week, Ms. Lohan is in full compliance with her court-ordered obligations.

Not!

At this juncture, just prior to a verdict being read, the court permitted Lindsay Lohan to stand and address the court.

Within minutes after asserting that she thought she was in compliance, and citing  unusual work-schedules to explain away irregularities, the pretty actress's voice filled with uncontrollable emotion - at which point - she broke down and cried.

Personally, I don't think they were crocodile tears.

Unfortantely, for me, the work excuses didn't hold much water.

Daily, defendants lose their apartments and jobs  on the heels of an arrest when they are jailed, put on probation, and so forth or so on.

That comes part 'n parcel with the conviction of a crime.

To expect to "do her time" - and continue normally with her life without interruption  - in view of life's reality regarding the legal system in this country today is a preposterous selfish notion.

At this juncture, the prosecutor launched her closing arguments.

"I appreciate the tears, but the truth is that she has not been in compliance," she started off.

The hefty middle-aged female attorney proceeded to rattle off  the details which didn't leave much doubt that Ms. Lohan was in fact - guilty of the accusations - as alleged.

Things got worse for Lohan when the Judge cited grounds for the ruling to be announced in the next breath or two.

"You lied when questioned about the DUI incident," she began.

For example, you tried to blame two others for the incident, before it was determined that you were actually driver of the vehicle, she added slowly and methodically.

When white powder was spotted on your jeans, you claimed the clothing was  not yours, she continued in earnest.

"However, friends testified that they were your favorite pants."

Liar! Liar! Your pants are on fire!

Gotcha!

Just betcha TMZ has dozens of shots of her in hob-nobbing at society events in those stylish threads, eh?

And, the Judge kept the hits zinging from the bench.

"You said you went to Promises for two weeks and that you were clean and sober. But your urine sample tested positive for cocaine," she noted solemnly for the court record.

Lies. Lies. Lies.

Finally, the sentence came down.

Lindsay was given three 30-day consecutive sentences in jail - in addition to - ninety days in rehab once the stint in the big house has been completed.

The emotionally-distraught starlet was ordered to surrender herself to the court on July 20th.

Just look at it this way, Lindsay, if you ever get called to audition for the part of Francis Farmer - you'll nab the part, no doubt - what with all the extensive experience under your belt 180 days from now.

Good luck, Lindsay.

Will come visit!



Did prior plunging neckline offend the court?

Roman Polanski...News alert! Officials to rule on whether to extradite!





Well, it's been a long haul for everyone involved!

But, Officials have finally spilled the beans.

Over the weekend, it was announced that the Swiss court will rule on the Polanski case in the near future.

At issue, of course, is whether the court has the authority to grant a request by Law Enforcement in California, to extradite fugitive Polanski to these shores to face the music at long last in respect to a decades-old rape charge.

News at 11!

Lindsay Lohan...shuns process server's papers at courthouse! Sued again!


Lindsay in happier days!




Frenzied paparazzi and media hounds from quite a few of the top news agencies around the country, swarmed like sharks down at the Beverly Hills Courthouse bright-and-early today, in a desperate effort to snatch up juicy tidbits about Lindsay Lohan and her morning appearance in court to face charges on a potential probation violation.

That hearing was no piece of cake for the troubled actress, for starters.

In fact, at one point, the Judge was forced to move for a recess, to satisfy a request by the prosecutor.

Apparently, Linday's attorney was prepared to present documents to the Judge which established that her client met the requirements of her probation (thus determining that Lohan was in compliance with the terms of the court agreement); however, the prosecutor protested on the grounds that her office had not received copies or been afforded the opportunity to review the documentation for authenticity.

The paperwork also included "evidence" that substantiated that Lindsay's various excuses in respect to other issues (a stolen passport, scram device being triggered at MTV awards, etc.) were not tall tales in a web of deception weaved to deceive the Judge presiding over the proceedings.

In addition, the Judge noted her frustration over the fact that the Lindsay Lohan's "track record" of attendance in her court-ordered classes was not available.

While the Judge admitted that protecting their client's privacy was not improper, she wondered aloud why the paperwork was not submitted if - as Lohan claimed - the obligations were met without any hitches.

But, the big surprise descended on Ms. Lohan when she stepped into an elevator while in transit at the courthouse.

Out-of-nowhere, a process server attempted to hand-off a complaint for damages (civil lawsuit), to the emotionally distraught star.

"Get him out of here," she alleged screamed, shortly after refusing the paperwork in front of a throng of startled onlookers.

In response, the process server dropped the complaint at her feet, beaming that service was effected.

According to the "Tough as Nails" delivery man, service is quite proper "if there is a "face-to-face" encounter.

Notwithstanding, it should be noted that the purpose of "service" is to notify the defendant of the pending litigation.

No doubt, after the ugly incident this morning, Lindsay is keen to the fact she is being sued.

Mission accomplished!



BP...fined 5.2 million by Bureau of Ocean Management! Irregular bookkeeping on Tribal land!







The newly-formed "Bureau of Ocean Energy Management" levied their first fine against BP Oil for “submitting false, misleading, or inaccurate” reports in respect to Natural gas production on Southern Ute Tribal land in Colorado.

Although Tribal auditors notified BP Oil of the errors three years ago, the company continued to drag its feet when it came to acknowledging - and correcting - the discrepancies singled out by the Tribe’s leaders.

Allegedly, BP oil failed to correctly report royalty rates, sales prices, and production data related to the leases in Utah.

BP racked up a staggering 25, 949 violations which triggered fines totaling 5.2 million.

A spokesperson for BP blamed “coding errors” on the glaring irregularities.

According to the Government, the whopping penalties were warranted to reflect a pattern of behavior that flagrantly disregarded the importance of proper record-keeping.

“It is simply unacceptable for companies to repeatedly misreport production, particularly when it interferes with the auditing process,” summed up Michael Bromwich, director of the Ocean Energy Management agency.


Immigration Reform Act...President Obama should consider quotas!




The Man in the Mirror!




Everyone agrees that securing the borders with stepped-up patrols to stop the flow of illegals into the U.S. border states is not enough.

And, that fining employers who hire undocumented workers, is essential too.

But, the aforementioned measures are not the “be all” and “end all” to the out-of-control problem.

So, when the President noted that landmark Immigration Reform was the answer, many rallied in support.

Unfortunately, at this juncture, it is doubtful that the  ambitious proposal will see the light of day this year.

Then, why the televised speech on Immigration reform in recent days?

With Obama’s approval rate at an all-time low, pundits speculate that the speech was a bold-faced effort to send a signal to the Latino community, that he will make things right when given the opportunity.

In a nutshell, the President was dangling a carrot, and hinting that backing the Democrats would be beneficial to their cause (somewhere down the political highway).

It has been suggested that Obama could use his authority as President to grant a “pardon” to all illegal immigrants in the country - and thus - resolve the Immigration snafu with the flourish of a pen.

The notion is not a wild one necessarily.

In 1986, the Government passed a landmarkImmigration Act, which granted amnesty to undocumented aliens who could prove (by way of documentation) that they were in residence in the U.S. for a specific duration of time.

In the current scenario, the President would be forced to give a nod to at least 12 million undocumented aliens, according to the last record-taking on the numbers.

“Too much of a burden on the Nation,” some lament.

Indeed, illegals have been accused of not only draining public resources (the welfare system, medical services, school funding, public assistance programs) but also depleting the budgets to a breaking point.

In view of this, President Obama must be cautious.

Many solutions have been tossed about - from the “pardon” idea - to one that promotes “sweeping change” in a well-crafted Immigration Reform bill.

But, why is it that no on has raised the issue of quotas?

A couple of decades ago, it was a prestigious privilege to be granted a Visa or the blessing of residency in the United States.

In those days, unless an applicant was a brain surgeon - or in a career area that would contribute to the American way of life in a high-profile positive way - legal status would be rejected.

Today, power-brokers in Washington representing companies seeking cheap labor, are hell-bent on opening the borders wide to day workers to protect and bolster their clients’ profit margins.

To grant legal status in one fell swoop would not only overwhelm the Nation, but have a devastating impact on the work force and the economy.

Which begs the question.

Why hasn’t Barack Obama explored the issue of quotas?

Instead of just “pardoning”, or “passing a reform bill”, why not start advancing the idea that illegals in the country step forward and petition for legal status with the provision that they meet the criteria of a set “quota”?

After all, no sane Government of any great forward-thinking Nation, would just throw open the doors to the humbled masses without balances and checks in place.

Bottom line, a quota could turn out to be the “compromise” that warring factions on Capitol Hill may be able to accept.

Surely, a sophisticated country like the United States of America, can find an equitable solution to the problem.

God willing!



God willing!

Monday, July 5, 2010

Judd Apatow...to produce PEE WEE HERMAN big-budget feature!






Judd Apatow announced through his handlers that he has committed to produce a wide screen version of Paul Reuben’s celebrated pop culture character “Pee Wee Herman”.

According to a publicist, Reubens is expected to co-write the script with Apatow.

The project is a boost for the Pee Wee Herman star, especially when you consider that Apatow’s prior films - "Knocked up" and the "40-year old Virgin" - were smash money-making hits at the box office.

After a much-publicized scandal over a conviction on lewd-conduct charges, which initially negatively-impacted and stalled his career, Reubens has struggled to regain his former status in the show-biz arena.

A break-through arrived last year in the guise of a stage production based on the Pee Wee character.

The hit comedy is slated for 48 performances on Broadway to rev up in October.

Looks like the big adventure is not over yet for Paul Ruebens.




Pee Wee's perverted alter-Ego!

Al Gore...groping investigation! Where there's a masseuse, there's trouble...


I did not sexually grope that woman!





When I reported that Al Gore and wife Tipper were parting ways amicably a few weeks ago, many whispered behind-the-scenes that there was a deep dark secret that triggered the break-up.

Post: 06/01/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/06/al-goreand-wife-tipper-to-separate.html

Post: 06/02/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/06/al-goredated-without-tippers-knowledge.html

Now that the Portland Police have confirmed that a prior investigation has been re-opened - and that Al Gore is the prime suspect in a groping incident- in retrospect - the sudden break-up announcement makes sense.

Did Al deliberately distance himself from Tipper because he was alerted to the fact the probe was on the fast track - and to save her from the a tawdry scandal - that may be on the horizon?

A masseuse has alleged that the former Vice President made unwanted sexual advances on the occasion of a professional massage therapy session in his Hotel Lucia suite.

Sounds dicey from the get-go, doesn’t it.?
Even more so, when the glare of the spotlight is tossed on all the salacious details.

For instance, Gore registered at the Hotel under an assumed name, Mr. Stone.

Was he anticipating - or counting on some hanky panky going down - when he first booked the trip?

If I recall correctly, some masseuses use steamed rocks in their massage regimens.

Or, was Gore simply taking a poke at his own much-publicized stoney demeanour?

News at 11!
 
 
 

Arizona Immigration Law...Nevada Highway Patrol incident triggers doubts about law!






Yesterday, I was witness to shocking conduct of a Nevada Highway Patrol Officer - by the name of Del Padre (Badge # 691) - which now casts doubt in my mind on the ability of officers to act justly in a given situation when given too much free rein.

As I was drafting the post (published yesterday) it suddenly occurred to me that critics of the controversial Arizona Law may be right in their assumptions that rogue cops will abuse their authority, Violate Citizen Rights, and thereafter, engage in cover-ups to hide their tracks.

In the illegal stop yesterday (on Nevada's I-15 in Las Vegas) Office Del Padre willfully and wrongfully ignored DMV paperwork and documentation, and the rule of Law - and thereafter - deceitfully sought to destroy evidence that would incriminate himself.

In the process, an innocent Citizen was needlessly "victimized" by Officer Del Padre, suffered undue mental, physical, financial and emotional hardship, and had their rights violated in the process.

California Highway Patrol "Incident"

Post:  07/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

In the aforementioned scenario that when down on the 4th of July - the motorist informed Del Padre of applicable State & Federal Laws in force across the land - but, he chose to willfully and wrongfully ignore recognized policies.

After the fact, Del Padre attempted to "destroy" evidence to protect himself from incrimination.

Can you imagine what would happen if a corrupt rogue cop like Del Padre was acting under the authority of the new Arizona Immigration Law?

I hazard a guess that people's rights would be violated left, right, and center - and that he (and Officers that run in that corrupt pack) - would persistently engage in conspiracies after-the-fact to cover-up their wrongdoing.

At this juncture, and in view of what occurred yesterday on a Nevada Highway, it is evident that the Arizona Immigration Law may have to be reconsidered.

It's obvious from Del Padre's conduct that some Law Enforcement Officers should  never be given carte blance because they lack the moral rectitude which is a prerequisiste for being granted some sweeping authority.



http:/www.julianayrs.com

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Pamela Anderson...to celebrate Birthday @ Tao! July 10th (Las Vegas)...







Sexy Siren Pam Anderson isn’t going to let another year of mileage on her voluptuous bod curb her style.

In fact, the former VIP star is tossing a bash at TAO to celebrate the close of another spectacular year (personally and professionally).

Although Ms. Anderson didn’t nab the “Disco Ball” on Dancing with the Stars, for instance, along the contest trail the she managed to silence her critics and wow audiences with dazzling show-stopping numbers each week.

The Birthday Girl Blow-out is being hosted by TAO Beach & the TAO Nightclub on July 10th.

Info: www.taolasvegas.com



 
Custom Search