Saturday, February 6, 2010

Sarah Palin...$100 thousand tea party speech bid for Presidency! Nervous Ice Queen strikes chord...



Scarlett Lady appears at Tea Party Convention for big bucks!


The horse everyone was betting on trotted out of the gate and sped down the well-beaten track at a good pace for about twenty minutes or so, inspired a few heartfelt emotions that sent the frenzied ticket-holders to their feet roaring approval, then sadly stumbled and lost her way momentarily just before catching stride at the finish line.

Too late?

The event was much-ballyhooed.

Sarah Palin - fresh off a couple of scandals - stridently made her way out onto the stage amidst wild applause to deliver a key note speech with a $100,000.00 price tag at the Tea Party's first National Convention.

And, when you consider the cost to supporters, it was evident - that contrary to Palin's assertions - the high-profile event was not populist but elitist instead.

Attendees paid through the nose ($549 a pop) to sit up-front and egg the tarted-up broad on (do you suppose the clothes were rented once again?).

That, they sure as heck did.

On more than one occasion, a cross-section of American voters jumped to their feet, and vigorously flaunted their approval.

And, at the end of her speech, thunderous applause was followed by a chant that swept all up in the heady moment.

"Run Sarah. Run Sarah. Run Sarah. Run!"

Palin's second bite at the apple?

You betcha!

Frankly, I think she should let sleeping Polar Bears ly.

The perky little bundle of energy started off the night's farce with a round of thanks and got tea party tottlers all  warm and tingly inside when she used a myriad of hokey moments laced with soppy sentimentality to lure everyone into the fold.

"God Bless America. It's Great to be an American," she shouted out to the effervescent supporters.

"Do you love Freedom," she quizzed the excited throngs in the packed house.

"I salute all the men in uniform."

When servicemen in the crowd responded with a boisterous roar, she beamed.

"Thank you."

Tongue in cheek, the former Alaskan Governor welcomed C-Span.

"You weren't invited to the Health reform summits, but glad to have 'ya here," she sang out like a cheerful little songbird.

The spitfire facilitated all the gimmicks within her greedy grasp to nab the attention of folks from the heartland who tend to wear the old red white and blue on their sleeves.

In a nutshell, the Republican icon described tea party advocates as real people (not politicos, oh no!) with common sense conservative principles

Out-of-the blue she cried out enthusiastically: 

"Happy Birthday, Ronald Reagan."

Do you suppose she knows he's dead?

Of course, she would have been remiss in her duties if she neglected to thank the TP's host city.

Nashville has sweeter tea, she teased, after noting Alaska sipped on their own brand of Ice Tea.

Judging  from the response of the locals, something mind and mood altering must have been surreptiously slipped into the mix.

Drunk with adoration?

When Palin gave kudos to Scott Brown, she melted into a gooey-eyed teen with a schoolgirl crush.

"He was just a guy with a truck (and a  penchant for posing nude) who realized one day that things were not right."

She theorized it was the grass roots route that landed him in the Senator's seat in Massachusetts.

And, shortcomings on the part of the Democrats, that cinched the deal.

Washington needs to stop lecturing and start listening, she undersccored to the hyped-up crowd below the floodlights, with an obvious sly reference to Barack Obama and his methodology.

In fact, she boldly accused Obama, Pelosi, and Reid of being involved in an agenda that was out-of-touch.

"There are big problems around this country," she cried out with passion.

At this juncture, a quiver in her voice revealed that she was - in fact - nervous.

Perhaps that is why she raced through the speech - in a running-off-at-the-mouth kind-of-style - without stressing any of the salient points with a hand gesture, for instance, which may have rustled up a smidgen of eloquent drama often achieved by the greats such as former President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King.

Suddenly, without warning, a lack of reading and comprehension skills interrupted her flow (and crediblity) as she headed down to the finish line.

It turned out to be a dead give-a-way.

For example, on two or three unfortunate occasions, she tripped up when words failed to flow trippingly off the tongue.

In fact, as she attempted to regain balance and composure, it was obvious to moi that Palin was not the sole author of the speech!

Clearly, she contributed a couple of folksy quips, but the bulk of the attention-getter was obviously put together by a clever speech writer out to tie up all the loose strings required to deliver up a neat and tidy package.

The invisible hand behind-the-secnes whipped up a couple of notions that resonated.

For instance, McCain's former running mate noted that politicians with the best ideas, would surely win out.

In that regard, she noted that a candidate should put their faith in their ideas and realize that  in the final analysis, the Tea Party was not a top-down operation but a ground-up call to action.

Palin also focused on "the people" a lot.

"This is about the people," she assured the attentive audience in one segment of the speech.

"People have to change the way of doing business in Washington," she predicted for the future.

In a slap at Obama, she elaborated that a charismatic guy with a teleprompter wasn't going to cut it.

In contrast, she hailed Tea Party members who got involved - went to town hall meetings - penned op eds, etc.

Right on cue, she criticized the political double-talk.

Palin thought it disingenuous that the war was referred to by the Democrats as an overseas contigency operation (which sucked big time to her).

"National security has to call it the way it is."

At this juncture, she leapt into full-frontal attack on the events of Christmas-day past.

Security did not work!

Palin got quite a reaction when she expressed her annoyance over one particular aspect in the aftermath.

"Before the terrorist was interrogated, he seized on our 1st Amendment Rights, and pled the fifth," she raged in so many words.

In what amounted to a low blow, Palin hurled a biting criticism in the President's direction, that must have stung.

"We need a commander-in-chief - not a professor of Law - standing at the lecturn."

APPLAUSE!

The keynote speaker sequed into the issue of foreign affairs momentarily, too.

"We need a policy so that we can recognize friends from enemies."

Although many politicians are afraid to broach touchy subjects (which may lose votes) Palin had no qualms stating for the record that Iran should be sanctioned.

The shop-a-holic (keen on blowing other people's wads) quoted Barry Goldwater at one point.

"We're not conquered just by bombs, but also neglect."

American must stand with peoples and democracies which reflect our values and interests - was one comment - that touched a chord also.

"Foreign policy is not about resolving personalities."

APPLAUSE!

How about winning popularity contests?

That is right up the former Ice Queen's hunting trail.




Tea Party Nation!

Pavillions...employee hanky-panky in Men's bathroom! Be wary of unwanted advances...



Wham Bam thank you man!
(toilet sex addicts work at Pavillions)




I was quite shocked last night to encounter a couple of Pavillions employees trailing customers into the men's room on the look-out for a little toilet sex under their bosses noses while on duty.

Shortly after some dental work was performed on a broken crown yesterday afternoon, I zipped into Pavillions for a quench-thirster and snack, before heading into the restoom to check my mouth for bleeding and determine how well an incision was healing.

As I breezed into the water closet (no pun intended)  I encountered a tall gentleman with long scraggly streaked hair - rail thin - puffing himself up in front of a mirror at one of the sinks.

In the midst of a sex change?

If so, the image was that of a half-baked female, and nothing convincing.

After taking a quick whiz, and washing my hands, a Pavillions employee dashed in the door and nearly knocked me down as I turned to pluck up a paper towel from a machine affixed to the wall.

About a second later, another employee also strode in, and proceeded to gawk up and down at my body.

Obviously, the two horny dudes (both overweight and ugly)  followed me into the mens room after spying me walk through the door minutes earlier.

Sorry, dudes, I'm not into toilet sex.

Give George Michael a call, why don't you?




George caught with di** in wringer!

Luxury Furs... Lindsay Lohan listen up! Donate furs to Wildlife Shelters...



Fashion "no no"



Last year, Lindsay Lohan was doused with flour when she trotted the red carpet at a high-profile event overseas in a full-length fur.

PETA's sneak attack was swift and right on target!

The startled actress was  humiliated and made a public spectacle of while the world watched on.

Fashion savvy gals are clued in.

Tossing on furs slaughtered off of wild (and possibly endangered) species  is not stylish!

For this reason, Lindsay may want to consider donating her furs (she can still wear the faux with pride) to a wild life shelter.

Right now, there is an ongoing program to use donated furs as bedding for wild animals left orphaned or homeless for whatever reason.

"This is a creative way to help animals in need," said Danielle Bays, a Humane Society wildlife issues associate.

Wildlife rehabilitators cut the fur into an appropriate size for the animal (whether a chipmunk, raccoon, squirrel or opossum) and put it inside the animal's enclosure. The furry blanket becomes a "surrogate mother" to the orphaned or injured animal reducing stress and giving comfort.

The Humane Society of the United States Cape Wildlife Center on Cape Cod is one of many wildlife rehab centers that make good use of old furs.

 "Orphaned baby animals generally do quite well when raised by a licensed wildlife rehabilitator," said Dr. Rachel Blackmer, DVM, director of the Cape Wildlife Center.

"At the Center, we often give orphaned baby squirrels and rabbits a small piece of a donated fur coat and they snuggle against it readily. It is very important to minimize human contact with orphaned mammals while still providing comfort and a safe environment," she said.

The HSUS accepts all fur and fur-trimmed apparel, including shearling. Fur accessories including hats, gloves, scarves and muffs are also accepted.

"Ideally, we wish no animals were killed for their fur," Bays said.

 "Killing animals for their fur is cruel and unnecessary. Unfortunately, that doesn't change the fact that there are many fur coats and accessories languishing in closets and attics everywhere. Donating furs to wildlife rehabilitation is one way to give back to the animals," she said.

Donating is easy.

Package your fur in a sturdy box or padded envelope for small items and mail it to

Fur-Free Century
The HSUS
2100 L Street NW
Washington, DC
20037.

The HSUS will send a letter thanking you for your donation.

When received, file it with your tax documents for future reference.

If you plan to itemize tax deductions, you can claim the fair market value, the amount you could sell the fur for today.

Furs valued at $5,000 or more must have a "qualified appraisal", according to the IRS.

You must have this appraisal done before sending The HSUS your donation.


Friday, February 5, 2010

Dr. Conrad Murray...LAPD bowing to pressure? No surrender, yet...






I reported earlier today (and two days ago) that Dr. Conrad Murray flew into LA LA LAND on his own hard-earned buck ready to surrender to the LAPD on a charge (in some degree) of murder.

I noted in those posts that there was an outcry from family members who raged that Michael Jackson's physician was, in essence, rustling up special treatment by virtue of his lawyer's slick behind-the-scenes maneuvering.

Post:  05/03/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/02/charlie-sheenstolen-mercedes-crash.html

Post: 03/03/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/02/michael-jacksondrmurray-to-surrender-to.html

In particular, Jackson's sister was quite vocal about the fact that the LAPD had no qualms hand-cuffing Michael when he was arrested on alleged child molestation charges (in the midst of a demeaning public spectacle).

Consequently she wondered aloud to all within earshot - why Dr. Murray was  not facing the same routine arrest - like any other citizen being charged and prosecuted for a crime.

In all the reports I have sifted through, I haven't been able to turn up one good reason why Murray should be entitled to turn himself  in to the LAPD,  in the man prescribed  by his lawyers.

If you recall, Jackson's physican has been accused of administering a controlled substance in a lethal dose without following appropriate protocol.

Red-faced reps on both sides have agreed on one thing for sure:

No surrender, yet!

News at 11.



Charlie Sheen...stolen Mercedes & crash fishy Tiger Woods tale?


 
Well, he's got the acting chops to pull it off!

But, the bizarre tale that went out over the newswire earlier today sounded a lot like a Tiger Woods misadventure, to moi.

Allegedly, a Mercedes owned by actor Charlie Sheen, was stolen and later ended down a ravine totalled.

Curiously, search teams who arrived at the crash site - on the heels of a 911 call - combed the area and were unable to locate the driver.

The incident occurred at approximately 4 a.m. on Mulholland Drive in the tony climbs of Beverly Hills.

Sheen called police to report the car stolen, according to a police spokesman, involved with the case.
Coincidentally, another luxury car stolen from a nearby neighborhood was discovered 200 yards from where Sheen's car was located.

The discovery of the 2009 silver Bentley coupe was reported to police about 1:45 p.m. by a press photographer.

Is it possible the two incidents are related - or has Mr. Sheen seized on the fact there were robberies and car thefts in the neighborhood of late - to explain away a smash-up he was involved in?

The incident comes as Sheen faces a court hearing in Aspen on Monday in connection with a domestic violence incident.

Sheen, is alleged to have attacked his wife of 19 months, Brooke Mueller, at a vacation home in Aspen on Christmas Day.

I reported on the incident in December.

Post:  12/26/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/12/charlie-sheenhollywood-bad-boy-charged.html

I could put two and two together and come up with a dynamite scenario.

Worried about the hearing on Monday, Sheen downs one too many ales when out with pals, ends up miscalculating a turn under a dark cloudy sky on the way home, and suddenly finds himself roaring off Mulholland Drive.

Unhurt, but panicking, Sheen dashes from the scene of the accident to avoid an additional complication in his life.

Later, when his wits are about him ( and he has had the opportunity to chat up good old dad for some advice)  - he calls the police to report the vehicle stolen as quickly as possible to ultimately erase all potential doubt about any personal involvement in the accident.

What say you?

The 44-year-old action/comedy star currently appeared in the primetime television comedy series "Two And A Half Men".

If you ask me, his personal life is stranger than fiction, and more fascinating to stand on the sidelines and watch.

News at 11!




Dr. Conrad Murray...Jackson doc surrenders to police @ 1:30 p.m. today!



Michael didn't need to die!


Dr. Conrad Murray ready to face music!


Day before last I reported that Dr. Conrad zMurray (who confessed to administering a lethal dose of Propofol to Michael Jackson which resulted in his untimely demise in June of 2009) flew to Los Angeles to surrender to the LAPD.
 
Post:  02/03/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/02/michael-jacksondrmurray-to-surrender-to.html

Today, sources have confirmed that Dr. Murray will turn up at the Police Station this afternoon to hand himself in to authorities with lawyers by his side (Friday February 5th).

For several weeks rumors have floated out of the inner sanctum at the Law Enforcement Agency that charges of involuntary manslaugher - at a minimum - were about to brought against the troubled doctor who was last seen with Michael just shortly before his death.

Meanwhile, some controversy arose in recent days, over the  the manner of arrest proposed.

Lawyers for the doctor were anxious to have their client turn himself in without the necessity of a formal arrest which would have included handcuffing amidst a swirl of paparazzi (in what would have amounted to a media circus) charging in for candid shots.

On the other side of the coin, concerned individuals complained that Dr. Conrad Murray - in a self-surrender scenario - would appear to be getting special treatment.

Even heiress Paris Hilton was once forced to endure the demeaning process while the world looked on.

Defence lawyers and law enforcement officials apparently reached an accord behind the scenes, and so, the good doctor is slated to appear before a Judge for a brief hearing at 1:30 p.m.

Sources close to the court proceedings have conjectured that the hearing will be video-taped.

Law enforcement officials previously revealed that prosecutors planned to charge the doctor with involuntary manslaughter on the grounds that he allegedly gave Michael  the powerful anaesthetic to help him sleep without following proper protocol (which ultimately led to his death).

Michael Jackson's family have lamented that an involuntary manslaughter charge amounts to just a slap on the wrist.

News at 11!


Super Bowl...Bruce Springsteen & Stones best half-time gigs! Saints nab trophy...



Springsteen top vote-getter in poll!




Halftime Super Bowl performances have become legendary musical events over the years.

So, of course, pollsters at the Los Angeles Times were inclined to pose a question to their readers.

"Who had the best Super Bowl halftime show?"

Within days, there was a frenzied response from fans, keen to lodge their favorites.

The winner hands down?

Why, Bruce Springsteen, naturally!

After all, his hit - Born in the USA - is right up there with football as a prominent symbol of American Culture.

When the numbers were tackled Springsteen boasted a 10,000 vote lead in popularity, and thus, managed to squeak by Jagger and the other long-haired English blokes in his musical circle with ease.

U2's crescendo amounted to a palty 114 decibels - er - votes.

In the same scientific poll (!) 59 percent have speculated that the tough Saints will nab the prize.

The Colts are predicted to score big with 47 percent of the votes in their favor.

Moi?

I am always glued to the old  boob tube praying  for a wardrobe snafu to brazenly unveil some nubile flesh!

Play ball!



Saints predicted to snatch trophy!


Castillo Theatre..."The Task" cultural talk! Free Theatre event (Feb. 7th)...





After the afternoon matinee of the "The Task" at the Castillo Theatre on February 7th, there will be a CULTURE TALK  on the production.

"Theatrical Experiments: Approaching Müller’s The Task”

Curtain: 4:30 p.m.

The public is invited to attend  the event and engage in dialogue with the artists.

"I'm a sailor. I don't believe in politics. The world is different wherever you go." (The Task)

Or is it?

"Everywhere in our shrinking world, humanity wrestles with shared themes of love and betrayal, identity, obligations, and the consequences of our actions."

According to the creative team at the Castillo - these themes reverberate throughout their latest avant-garde production of Müller's - The Task - a play about a revolution called off.

The troupe (for the first-time ever an all-black cast) working in a variety of genres - avant garde, political, and black theatre - explore how artists may perform their way through shared concerns towards human development.

Karla Boos (Artistic Director of Pittsburgh’s experimental Quantum Theatre), Gabrielle L. Kurlander, (director of the Castillo’s current  production of  "The Task"),  Charles Weldon (Artistic Director of the Negro Ensemble Company) and  moderator Dan Friedman (Castillo’s dramaturg) will appear onstage to engage in a dicussion and interact with the audiencet.

A reception will follow.

The event is FREE!

Reservations (required due to limited space)

CASTILLO THEATRE
543 West 42nd Street
( 10th &  11th Avenues)
New York, NY

Box office:  212-941-1234

Info: www.castillo.org

Thursday, February 4, 2010

My brother passed away...a curious karmic relationship!


Toronto the good!
(my home town)



Gifted with love beads in 1969!
(Vancouver)


Last night I received a communication out-of-the-blue that my brother died.

In spite of the fact I was taken away from my family when I was seven - and made a ward of the State - I couldn't help but choke up when the sad news arrived.

Suddenly, I wondered about God's purpose and the reason for the strange karmic relationship with Bill.

Actually, my whole life has unfolded in a bizarre fashion, not unlike an intriguing novel.

In fact, at times I feel quite alien on this plane of existence.

Just maybe, I'm from another planet, and here to experience the human condition?

Until I was seven, I was raised at my mother's home on Old Weston  (Toronto) with the rest of the family (except for my father who died when I was a baby).

When I was transplanted out to the suburbs to the care of the Rigbys - I was soon out-of-touch - and on my new journey.

I didn't reunite with Billy (William) until the age of fifteen.

For one semester (at Humberside High) I snapped up his offer to reside in one room on the upstairs floor of the house that his wife's father provided for them to raise their children comfortably and safely.

Bill and his wife, Betty, were blessed with three healthy babies (Sandra, Scott and Sheila).

Actually, the teen lovers were babies when they married;  Bill, just twenty, and his wife sixteen!

For that reason - and a gambling streak fueled by alcholism - a separation was inevitable.

Bill was quite unlike me, wiry and earthy.

My uncle allegedly landed him a full-time job as a postal worker in Toronto - and for several years - he was a responsible worker who met his end admirably.

He was keen on hockey, a good cigar, and a beer or two (or three) while catching the game in the living-room from his favorite armchair.

But, the old demon rum started to take hold, and the young couple began to quarrel.

One day, Betty was preparing to do the laundry, when she stumbled on eighty dollars hidden in Bill's sock.

Angry about the dishonesty, Betty snatched it up, out of spite.

Boy, was there a row when he got home, and reached for his stash only to find it gone.

For the most part, we got along.

But, one day, everything came crashing down.

At that time, the Beatles and the Stones were popular, and all my friends at school were growing their hair.

When mine started to get a bit shaggy, Bill gave the directive to Betty that I go and get my ears "lowered".

How I ended up with such a conservative nerd as a brother, I'll never know, I thought at the time.

I tried to avoid the issue by coming home late after school (or hiding in my room until the dinner hour).

Finally, there was an ultimatum one night.

"Bill wants to know when you're going to get your haircut," Betty quizzed.

"The barber shop is closed," I half-whispered under my breath.

At this juncture Bill gave me a deadline.

"Tomorrow. Or else."

Curiously, the next day, I was scheduled to meet with my social worker.

When I explained the problem, he advised I speak to one of their therapists, and get some advice.

The gentleman was quite outgoing and made me feel at ease right away when I strolled into his office a bit meekly.

When I explained the dilemma he got straight to the point.

"Do you want to get your hair cut?"

"No. But, I don't want to upset my brother or cause trouble."

At this point, he leaned over the table, and calmly explained that it was my hair and that I should do what I wanted with it.

"Stop being a coward," he added.

So, that evening, I slowly made the long walk home.

As soon as I sat down to eat, my brother tensed up, and gave my sister-in-law a look.

"Why didn't you get your hair cut," she asked a bit nervously.

"Because I didn't want to," I barely uttered audibly.

There was huge silence - in fact - it was so loud it was deafening.

Suddenly, my brother jumped up with his plate of food in his hand, without warning.

As Betty and I hung our heads, Bill dashed into the other room and slammed his plate down on the arm of his chair -at which point - the impact broke the plate into smithereens.

"Nobody ever does anything I say," he shouted at the top of his lungs, as his food  scattered all over the carpet.

To avoid any further conflict or confrontation, I dashed upstairs, and threw myself down on my bed.

I was beside myself.

Suddenly, I recalled reading an article in the local newspaper that a lot of unhappy teens were heading out to Vancouver to become a part of the hippie movement.

And, get this, they all had long hair!

 I packed up a few articles of clothing, and with the cash I was supposed to use to buy a winter coat,  purchased a bus ticket to go west instead.

That was the last time I ever saw or spoke to my brother.

I hoped to make amends one day, but obviously, it was not in the cards.

As to being separated from my mother, I have one nugget of wisdom for social workers to consider.

"There is no substitute for a mother's love."





Memories of Kitsilano Beach
(Vancouver, B.C.)

Social Security...Obama needs to crack down on incompetence & error! SS staff cause Hardships & have bad attitude...





Social Security employees have sh** for brains!



Obviously, the Social Security Adminstration has taken over an old attitude that was once relegated to a  major American corporate giant.

"We're the Social Security adminsitration. We don't have to care."

In recent days, many individuals receiving benefits, have been angry over errors made by employees at the administration's main 800 line, for starters, which have caused them financial hardships (late checks, benefits processed and fired off to the wrong destination, you name it).

And, what disturbs me most of all, is this.

When caught - the employees lie to clients - to protect their fat backsides down at their stale old offices.

Of course, American citizens may have a difficult time rustling up a worker on the telephone to get things off their chest (after all, they're all automated to ensure employees can collect their paychecks without having to actually be concerned about the problems of their clients or work off any sweat to actually earn the money).

They're also too stupid to figure things out.

If they didnt' have clients collecting monhtly benefits, they wouldn't have jobs, right?

Barack, you need to clean house, especially at Social Security's main toll-free 800 line.

And, in particular, investigate the conduct of managers such as Melody Davis in the Hollywood field office who is an unscrupulous nasty individual by all accounts (known to destroy documents when her dishonesty is uncovered, proven to have engaged  in vendettas against clients who complained to her superiors, and on  occasion manipulated documents to avoid disciplinary action from higher-ups)

One of the main problems with the 800 line, for starters, is that it is manned by workers who are not qualified for the job; consequently, fatal mistakes are made in the processing of data which results in  unnecessary financial hardships to the clients on the other end of the phone line.

For example, when one client dialed up to change their direct deposit information, the SS worker did not complete the task properly. 

Imagine the stress and anxiety that was thrust on the individual (living from check to check in near destitution & ;home less) when the monies were not available on the payment date because the benefits were sent to the wrong financial institution!

When the party called back to straighten out the mess, SS employees were reluctant to admit fault.

And - during an attempt to sort out the snafu - Social Security made another error which delayed their benefits even longer!

To prevent the saga from dragging on the beneficiary was advised to go into the local field office and fill out paperwork so a trace could locate the stray cash (with the understanding - mind you -that they would receive a check that day).

All falsehoods!

At the local office in Hollywood (CA), a female clerk asserted that no check could be issued that day, until the trace was completed.

When the party noted they were done to their last $50.00  and needed to pay rent, she lied!

"You'll have a check on the 3rd of February," she assured the anxious disabled person.

False!

When the check did not arrive in the mailbox, they once again called Social Security, and were shocked to learn that no check had been re-issued (as falsely alleged by the SS employee in the Hollywood field office) and that it may be a week or so until they received their benefits.

What revolting  despicable conduct.

Imagine that individual  trekking down to the post office every day sure the check would be in the box - only to learn the sad truth days later - that the administration's clerk was a dirty rotten liar.

In addition to this cruel behaviour - have they no empathy or compassion? - there are so many other flaws in their procedures, too.

For instance, if you call the Holllywood Vine Street field office, first you will be greeted by a tape recording assuring you that a social worker will be with your shortly.

In the interim, the client is offered various choices on the automated system, with lousey nerve-wracking muzak droning on  in the background ad nauseam.

On numerous occasions, an automaed voice will "thank" the individual for waiting, which inferss that the line is going to be anwered (when, in fact, it is not).

One person I spoke with lamented that they waited on the phone for about forty minutes, at which point, there was a clicking sound and the call was forwarded on to a desk at that Hollywood office.

Guess what?

It rang and rang and rang for about 200 times - and no one, not one soul - bothered to answer!

Curiously, a recording played back during the course of the wait, actually makes a point of noting that the line is being monitored for quality purposes.

Indeed!

Are supervisors at Social Security going to track down the employee who neglected their duties and take disciplinary action against them?

Hell no!

Many Americans on Social Security are subsequently forced to go down to the local office  in person, to ensure that action is taken to resolve their problem, since they can't  reach anyone on the phone.

In this scenario, they'll be shuffled from one line to another - called by number again and again - and then be forced to wait!! waii! wait!

During the interview they are treated shabbily - demeansed beyond imagination - then lied to about the circumstances surrounding  the errors SS  made which caused great mental, emotional, and financial hardship.

Is this humane, Mr. President?

And, when you consider most of these individuals are seniors who are weak and unable to fight for themselves in most cases, the Social Security adminstration should be downright ashamed.

I say fire these incompetent insensitive a**holes - Melody Davis first off - and purge the adminstration of the incompetence, error, and out-dated out-moded Social Security system which is clearly broke and needs fixing.

Americans deserve something better.

Amen!

Democrats...Membership card arrives by snail mail! Lucille Ball a communist...



Million dollar smile in wallets around America!




Lo & behold!

Imagine that.

I opened up my snail-mail box and there was a surprising offering for me from the Democrats (fired off at the directive of Nancy Pelosi).

It was a generous invitation to become a full-fledged member of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC).

Although I immigrated to the U.S. from Canada decades ago, I have never been associated with any political party.

I am generally not that kind of beast.

In fact, when I am queried as to whether I am a Democrat or Republican, I proudly respond:

"I'm a Canadian."

What's a boy to do?

After all, joining the democrats may come back to haunt me.

Who knows?

Some Americans might recall that way back in the McCarthy era, there was a witch hunt on for communists in the film and televsion industry.

Unfortunately, Lucille Ball - who was the star of her hit show at the time - was singled out as a "red" through and through (along with a posse of other writers, actors, and directors).

The shake-down for Lucy began when it was discovered she once attended a meeting for the communist party before she became ultra famous.

As it turned out, Ms. Ball attended one party meeting to appease her grandfather, who was tinkering with other political philosophies at the time.

Regrettably - as Ricky would say - she had some splainin'  to do.

Poor Ms. Ball  - she was dragged before the Committee - and  hounded and harassed  until they were satisified she wasn't a nasty commie traitor.

By the way, the membership card has some physcial appeal, too.

It fits snugly in a wallet window, where die-hard Obama followers can glance at the Saviour's image (it's etched on the face of the card) now and then throughout the busy work day when they feel a need for hope or inspiration or advice on where to vacation in tough economic times.

Surprisingly, the Democrats have chosen a profile shot not normally used with Barack Obama looking "left".

If it stimulates the cash flow through my wallet, well I'm no stick in the mud.

In it goes, nice 'n easy!

On the reverse of the card there is a reminder about my importance in the scheme of things.

"Please accept this card as a member of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee as a symbol of your leadership within the National Democratic Party."

Whoopee!

Will it gaurantee me a burger, an  invite to the White House beer garden, and carte blance to gate crash?

Sure wouldn't mind kicking up my heels at one of those wild parties Obama's always tossing (according to the tabloids).

If an overnighter is conceivable, then I'll put my dibs on the Lincoln Room, please.

And, I'd like a personal tour of the Oval office where Clinton blew a little smoke with Monica and coined the phrase a "Lewinski".




Barack Obama...Vegas slams Prez! Sin City deserved dressing-down...



Sin City cries the blues!


Dirty old Mayor incensed by Obama remarks!



Once again, Barack Obama opened his yap and ended up with a shovel or two of desert sand being shoved down his throaat.

Yup!

Those lounge lizards and politicos in the Nevada oasis are hopping mad again!

Recently, Barack Obama was inclined to make a comment about Vegas, which he thought was practical advice.

In a letter to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Obama noted in passing, that Americans shouldn't blow their money in Vegas - but instead - save it for College.

The comment sparked rage for a second time in the fleshpot of the Nation - where the vices of weak individuals - are inclined to get the best of them.

The end result?

Cash down the drain on slots, too much booze, and pleasures of the sinful kind that break of up marriages and sully the images and reputations of high-profile figures (Tiger Woods ring any bells?)

Ah, the follies invvoled in the  pursuit of pure unadulterated sex!

It was the second time since taking office that Obama singled out Las Vegas as a potential cesspool of irresponsible excessive spending.

If you recall, Obama criticized bank employees for jetting off to Vegas and splurging at a time when most Americans were hurting financially.

At that time, the  City Fathers lamented that the unfair barb would negatively impact the Las Vegas  further.

Over the past couple of years, Vegas has been struggling to regain its former glory as a destination hot-spot.

The city's residents have been hard-hit from a two-year onslaught of of foreclosures, bankruptcies and unemployment.

Tourism is the Silver State's most valuable commodity, and in view of this, there has been an outcry from  ranks of high order in the wake of the disclosure that Barack has named Vegas as a potential culprit once again.

The President was quick to jump into the fray in a concerted effort to smooth over the troubled waters.

"I was making the simple point that families use vacation dollars, not college tuition money, to have fun," Obama said, according to the letter released by Reid's office.

"You don't go buying a boat when you can barely pay your mortgage," Obama said.

 "You don't blow a bunch of cash on Vegas when you're trying to save for college. You prioritize. You make tough choices."

"There is no place better to have fun than Vegas, one of our country's great destinations," he noted in the aftermath.

For the record, Mr. Obama also underscored that he has always enjoyed his visits to gambling gulch.

However, vacations there may not be so satisfying in the future, if  Mayor Goodman has any say in it.

Goodman - not only lambasted Obama during a hastily called news conference - but assured all within earshot that the President was  no friend to Las Vegas and would not be welcomed there  if he visits.

"I'll do everything I can to give him the boot," Goodman said.

"This President is a real slow learner."

Barrack's comments quickly sparked a negative gut reaction elswhere in the Silver State which supported Obama in the 2008 election.

Goodman and others are worried that Obama's words will discourage visitors from jetting off  to Las Vegas -  and that as a result -  the industry will be depressed further.

"Enough is enough!" Democratic Congresswoman Shelley Berkley said in a one accusing statement.

"President Obama needs to stop picking on Las Vegas and he needs to let Americans decide for themselves how and where to spend their hard-earned vacation dollars."

Senator John Ensign (Repuplican) pointed out from the sidelines that the President may not have grasped the weight that his words carry around the country (and beyond).

"The President needs to lay off Las Vegas and stop making it the poster child for where people shouldn't be spending their money," Reid pointedly added.

 "I would much rather tourists and business travelers spend their money in Las Vegas than spend it overseas."

Nevada Governor Jim Gibbons, Rep. Dean Heller (Republican), and Democratic Rep. Dina Titus also roundly criticized the President.

"He has to step up right away and say, you know, he wasn't thinking," Goodman huffed.

 "Sometimes when he's not using his monitors and reading what he says, he doesn't think. And this is one of those times he didn't think, and he should straighten out the record because he's been here, he knows Las Vegas is a great place."

In my opinion, Las Vegas deserves a dressing-down.

Whenever the President or any politician takes a poke at Sin City they go up in arms.

However, as I have reported in past posts - Las Vegas casinos, City coppers, and others - have continually  given tourists and vistiors in general the shaft.

Instead  of taking  note of the valid criticisms - and taking action to cure the problems  - Las Vegas continues to ignore issues that are hurting its public image and turning visitors away.

For instance, in one post, I noted that I witnessed racial profiling in the streets.

Has the despicable practice stopped? 

No.

Post:  05/12/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/05/las-vegasracial-profiling-continues-on.html

I also reported that a handful of Hotels - such as the Sahara - were not disclosing fees to tourists when they booked rooms (a disreputable practice that is downright fraudulent in nature).

Has that issued been addressed by the Mayor or Casino owners? 

No.

Post:  09/15/09

http://julian1st.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/las-vegas-sahara-hotel-fails-to-disclose-fees-bad-buffet-beef-security-detail-taunts-guests/

In spite of the fact Las Vegas has been crying the blues over loss of revenue,  they continue to engage in violations of citizens rights (which summarily turn tourists off).

For example, at Harrah's and Fitzgerald's Hotels, security guards often shake-down guests on the casino floor - detain them, ask inappropriate questions, and violate their civil rights - without legal authority to do so

It's harassment plain and simple!.

Who wants to patronize an establishment that runs rough-shod over the rights of the individual?

Has the problem been addressed? 

No.

Post::  09/10/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/harrahsvegas-casino-staff-harass-guests.html

Post:  01/13/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/01/las-vegas-boundnot-fitzgerald-hotel.html

Also, Las Vegas would have you believe they welcome tourists with open arms, but have a curious way of showing their appreciation for the business.

On many occasion, for example, I have witnessed traffic cops pull over pedestrians (who are often from foreign countries and unfamiliar with the terrain and/or laws in the U.S.) and proceed to ticket them for jay-walking.

If Vegas is going to continue the practices aforementioned, they deserve to be shat upon.

Post: 09/28/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/09/las-vegasmotorcycle-cop-alan-doyle.html

So, President Obama, take note.

There are several glaring consumer issues in Vegas that cry out for investigation.

Just pick one for your next speech, eh?




Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Berlin Film Festival...Leonardo DiCaprio attends debut! Ewan McGregor trots for Polanski's "Ghost Writer"...


Shutter Island a big fat flop?



In the wake of the controversy over Polanski's incarceration (and legal wrangling ongoing in the courts) industry-insiders have been biting their nails in the aftermath and wondering what to expect at the world premiere of the outcast's new release - "The Ghost Writer" - slated to be unveiled at the Berlin Festival.

Ewan McGregor and Pierce Brosnan are expected to trot the red carpet, nonetheless, scattering a little stardust in their midst.

Leonard Di Caprio will be the big draw, however, with Martin Scorsese in tow for their offering.

Unfortunately, the previews I spied at a local theatre for their latest project - Shutter Island - spelled trouble in my estimation.

We'll see!

The organizers who hand out the prestigious "Golden Bear" award each year to deserving candidates in filmdom's artistic fields of endeavour have announced that twenty features will compete for the coveted prize.

Werner Hertzog will be one of many capable jurists bestowing the honors.

The festival runs from February 11 thru February 22.

On the splashy opening night - "Apart Together" - will screen to enthusiastic audiences.

Not surprising, since director Wang Quan'an won a Golden Bear in the past  for Tuya's Marriage (2007).
The Berlin Film Festival, also known as the Berlinale, is one of the world's leading film festivals and most distinguished media events.

It is held in Berlin and has been celebrated annually since 1978.

Tickets sold to date confirm that is the largest publicly-attended film festival worldwide.

Up to 400 films are shown in several sections representing comprehensive facets of  the cinema.

In addition to the aforementioned attendees, Gerard Depardieu will honor the fest with his formidable talents, when he graces the silver screen  in a film directed by Thomas Vinterberg (Danish).

Info:

http://www.berlinale.de/en/das_festival/festivalprofil/profil_der_berlinale/index.html




Michael Jackson...Dr.Murray to surrender to police! Admits injecting propofol...



Michael didn't need to die!


Dr. Conrad Murray ready to face music!



For weeks, there have been rumors that the LAPD is about to file charges against Dr. Conrad Murray, for administering a lethal dose of Propofol which ultimately caused pop icon Michael Jackson's untimely demise.

Although a representative from that  Law Enforcement Agency stressed this week that no documents have been  filed this week, the rumors have persisted that the troubled physician may have to face the music (no pun intended) soon.

The buzz has been heightened by the fact Dr. Murray travelledrecently  to Los Angeles on his own buck to await an arrest (which some surmise) is inevitable on charges of  involuntary manslaughter at a minimum.

Some feel that the charges (if and when imposed) may not be sufficient for the alleged crime.

For example, Michael Jackson's family believes involuntary manslaughter charges would be "just a slap on the wrist," attorney Brian Oxman said Wednesday.
"Dr. Conrad Murray displayed recklessness in dispensing powerful drugs to help Jackson sleep, warranting a second-degree murder charge. Involuntary manslaughter - the charge prosecutors reportedly plan to seek - carries a maximum jail sentence of just four years."

In a follow up summation, he inferred that Murray's conduct - in view of the facts - was downright criminal in the first degree.

"That is just a slap on the wrist, and a slap in the face, because Michael Jackson was someone who we knew was in danger of being brought to his knees, brought his death, by the use of these medications."

Although there is ample time for law enforcement to carefully dot all their "i's" and "t's"-  insiders close to the case are predicting - that an arrest is imminent.

To bring a manslaughter charge, prosecutors must show there was reckless action.

If a doctor is aware of a risk, and ignores proper protocol, then he or she may be held accountable.

Propofol is only supposed to be administered as an anesthesia by a professional in a medical setting (which was not the case with Michael Jackson).

And, a patient also requires constant monitoring, because the drug depresses breathing and heart rate while also lowering blood pressure.

A deadly combination of the two existed in respect to Jackson.
A cardiologist has maintained from the outset that nothing he gave the singer should have killed him.

Administering propofol to Jackson wasn't illegal, so prosecutors must show Murray deviated from accepted medical norms when he administered it in a non-medical setting while Jackson already had other sedatives in his system.

I was one of the first members of the media to report on the death of Michael.

That day, I happened to be on campus at UCLA, when his body was flown into the "emergency" medical center just across the street.

In fact, TMZ and I, were just about neck-and-neck in penning and posting the news alert on Twitter.

Post: 06/25/09 (Jackson dead!)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jacksoncollapsed-not-breathing.html

Post:  06/25/09 (Media Circus @ UCLA)
http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jacksonmedia-circus-ucla.html

Post: 06/26/09 (Jackson Wake)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jacksonwake-celebrates-life.html

Post:  06/30/08 (TMZ criticized)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/tmzmichael-jackson-scoop-stooping-low.html

Post: 07/03/08 (Tickets for Jackson Funeral)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/07/michael-jacksonhow-to-get-tickets-for.html

Post: 08/30/09 (Jackson death ruled homicide)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/08/michael-jacksondeath-homicide-overdose.html
.
Post:  06/29/08  (Fans place Flowers on Michael's Star)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/tmzmichael-jackson-scoop-stooping-low.html

Post: 06/29/08 (Fans brave hot sun to pay last respects)

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jacksonfans-wait-in-line-in-hot.html



Robert F. Kennedy Junior...polar bear SOS! Sign petition to protect endangered species...


Robert F. Kennedy SOS!


Recently, I caught a thought-provoking (disturbing) documentary on the plight of the Polar Bear at the Artivist Film Festival at the Egyptian Theatre (Hollywood).

Post:  12/06/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-bears-of-beaufortcaptivating.html

Now, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has also sprung into action to prevent the Polar Bear from disappearing off  the face of the globe.

Early this week, for example, I opened my snail mailbox -  and a well-researched packet on global warming and its impact on the Polar Bear - fell out into my hands.

In the informative documents fired off under the auspices of the NRDC (Earth's Best Defense) - Mr. Kennedy noted that in spite of the mounting death toll in the Arctic - the Interior Department has refused to give the polar bear the highest level of endangered species protection it so urgently needs and deserves.

Dumb politicians, with no compassion or foresight - such as Sarah Palin - have actually put their energy into ensuring the Polar Bear is not protected or included on the endanagered species list.

Shocking, in view of the facts, staring mankind in the face.

Right now the muffled cries of newborn polar bears can be heard far and wide as their snowy dens collapse from unseasonable rains.

The young are also succumbing to starvation after enduring longer and longer periods without food.

By virtue of a petition, Kennedy notes that over one million Americans are now preparing to call on the Obama administration to give the polar bear full-fledged protection.

In addition, the politician-turned-environmentalist, is fighting alongside other concerned citizens in federal courts around the country to put an end to industry groups and trophy hunters pushing the bear one step closer to extinction.

Inside the envelope, the NRDC has included a petition to sign and return to their headquarters in Merrifield (VA), with a plea to Interior Secreary Ken Salazar to launch a program to protect the bears right now.

Concerned citizens may also contribute donations (five dollars, ten  dollars, whatever) to help fund the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

In closing, Kennedy underscores that it will be an uphill battle, because there will be pressure from Oil lobbyists to maintain the current George Bush policy to promote oil exploration first and foremost.

If you recall, before leaving office - in the 11th hour of his Presidency - George W. auctioned off a vast expanse of Alaska's Chukchi Sea (home of half-a-million polar bears) to Shell and other oil corporations.

For starters, that could place the imperiled polar bear population in the path of any disastorous oil spill.

Act now, eh?

Info:  www.polarbearSOS.org

National Resources Defense Council
40 West 20th Street
New York, New York
10011





Barack Obama...China furious over proposed meeting with Dalai Lama!


President Hu an International joke!



Once again - Chinese Officials have flown into a nasty child's tantrum on the heels of the news that President Obama is entertaining thoughts of meeting with the exiled spiritual leader - the Dalai Lama.

In a terse press statement, Zhu Weiqun (Deputy head of the Communist United Front Works Department) stressed that talks with the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate were stalled with little hope for progress in respect to Tibet's cry for independence (release from the tyranny of the communist regime).

In so many words, China warned Obama that any proposed meeting would upset Sino-U.S. relations.

President Hu Jintao is slated to travel to Washington in April (tentative) and his advance team has cautioned that any audience with the Dalai Lama before that visit might anger the Chinese government and the Hu Jintao in particular.

Since when does the U.S. kow-tow to a foreign nation like China - a country that continually violates human rights and suppresses the will (and spiritual faith) of the people?

I trust that the President will ignore the foot stamping and give His Holiness his due.

Who needs China's toy imports rife with lead poisoning anyway?



Bush showed balls!

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

John Wildman...PR loser exits AFI Fest! Press roar in approval...


Wimpy PR bozzo!




Films critics, filmmakers, and a smattering of hangers-on pining to be bona fide power-brokers in the dream factory (Hollywood and the movie biz) - are ecstatic over the surpising (but welcome) exit of John Wildman from the PR headquarers locally at AFI.

In recent weeks during this year's AFI screening extravaganza (amidst the old-world charm of the Roosevelt Hotel) I - for one - waved adios to the AFI par-tay on the heels of atrocious back-stabbing childish behaviour by PR man (wimp) John Wildman.

I should preface this article by noting that when I first applied for press credits way back in 2008 for the AFI Fest that year, Wildman was clueless about my background (and rise through the ranks over the past decade or so) ) in the industry.

Consequently, he was inclined to grudgingly offer up a  press badge - and throw me a bone or two now and then.- when it suited his whim.

Other reporters, bloggers - and the like - also complained non-stop nauseam about unfair treatment - triggered by an ego that was blown way out-of-proportion - especially in view of his lack of actual skills, talent, smarts (whatever).

There is a wise old saying that applies in this instant case in respect to my own run-in with Bob Gazalle's "house" boy.

"Never underestimate your adversary or - at a minimum - be aware of what an individual is capable of when you're sparring with them."

Because John wasn't familiar with my own realm of success - for instance - it wasn't until later that he realized what a heap load of sh** he stepped into due to his lack of, ethics, and non-existent  intelligence.

Even when he got a rude awakening one day, he was too stupid to licks his wounds, apologize, and make amends.

For example, during a particularly explosive day on the circuit, I proceeded to pen a post on his incompetence, bad attitude, and arrogance.

In addition, I proceeded to point out all his failings as a PR Director, and how it  negatively impacted the AFI Festival.

In response - he fired back with a nasty remark or two on my blog - in a bold-faced effort to embarrass me (which simply amounted to a bit of tit-for-tat).
But, I exercised my first bit of power right away; subsequently I didn't feel the graze of any of the stinging bullets he tried to whiz my way.

I not only ingored his barbs - but poste-haste - relegated the poorly-written attack (which amounted to a twisted and distorted interpretation of the facts) to the trash bin.

Next time we crossed paths, he proceeded to whine over the incident in front of onlookers, and had the gall to infer he'd been quite nice to me!

Fooey~

He's the kind of bastard who smiles to your face, then once you  turn away,  he stabs 'ya in the back.

John made a grievous error when he also played games with more poweful media types than he.

For example, if a reporter or host rubbed him the wrong way - or didn't kow-tow to him or his staff - he'd make sure their coveted spot on the red carpet was in nowhere-land (at the end of the roped-off area where the poor schmuchs would essentially be viewed as cast-offs or lowly good-for-nothings)

Normally, by the time attendees got to that end of the gangway, they were being dragged away by equally rude and insulting underlings with no people skills, either.

Of course, all the Public Relations folks were pretty big nothings, in my opinion.

Most are failed actors, or wannabee producers, who have an itsy-bitsy piece of power shielding their clients (sometimes big stars) from the media, moguls, and tawdry social-climbers.

On many occasion, I laughed, when I witnessed their clients getting no press at all because the journalist was mistreated and put off by the public relations person's bad attitude.

If John Wildman had any ethics, sense of professionalism - or even an ounce of compassion - he would have stacked all the  nameplates into one neat pile, shuffled them vigorously, then laid them out  on the red carpet in the order they appeared from the top.

But John is  too dumb to conjure up smart ideas like that.

Beside, Wildman loves rubbing journalist's noses in sh**.

In the alternative, he's all over them like a dirty shirt, brown-nosing.

 Of course, I never put up with any of that bull, no sir!

I just kept notes, and embarrased the hell out of him and his staff, at every opportunity.

When I travelled to Dallas - you'd think that John wouldn't have been forewarned - about the perils of crossing moi!

Especially when you consider he realized early on - quite by accident - that fighting  me was a "no no" he should avoid at every cost.

For instance, one day John was googling himself  (yes, that's how vain he is) when he was shocked to stumble on a negative profile I penned on him.

He griped to one guest at the Festival lounge in Dallas - that  there was an  unsavory "review" of his public relations career skills - because of me.

That's how dumb John was.

I was quite aware of the fact that because of my stature in the industry - and due to the fact I wrote features on high-profile individuals - that I was pretty highly-ranked on search engines.

I knew right off-the-bat when he ran interference, and mistreated me, that he would end up all over the internet with a bad rep if I reported on his unprofessional conduct, ego-stroking, and selfish conduct.

Now, you'd think John would have learned his lesson, right?

No, he dug his heels in, and persisted with his shameful disreputable conduct.

On one occasion in Dallas, he actually lied and told me an event I wanted to attend (which I had been invited to by the organizers &sponsors) wasn't on the fest schedule!

Later, he relented, and admitted there was a special function for kids at Victory Park.

"I thought the tattler wouldn't be interested in the event because it was for kids," he waffled in his defense unconvincingly.

Was he kidding?

I have always loved being involved with projects for children; in fact, on numerous occasions I have promoted highly-lauded oganizations such as KIDS First, etc.

Even though that issue was ironed out to my satisfaction, with an apology to boot from Wildman, his sleazy conduct continued.

When the AFI was preparing to kick off  their 2009 Festival in Los Angeles in November, for example, I whizzed off an e-mail requesting my press pass for this year's celebration of film.

For a couple of days, John ignored my e-mail, in spite of the fact he assured me in the fall of 2008 that I was "family" now.

Yeah, he's such a phoney!

Should I have bowed down and kissed his unwashed feet?

Push came to shove, when a couple of journalists (and moi) were insulted on the opening night of the AFI Fest, after a premiere red carpet screening.

I sipped on a beer for awhile, and then elected to take in a private party at the poolside bar, at the rear of the Roosevelt Hotel.

A tall imposing Afro-American guard - after catching sight of my press badge - barred my path and gruffly ordered me away.

"No press allowed," he snarled in my direction.

I understood that, no problem.

On occasion, celebrities pine for a bit of privacy, at after-parties held by the sponsors.

So, I drifted off to rustle up some action, elsewhere.

Shortly after, a couple of journalists spied me chug-a-lugging my beer in the main bar, and dashed off to let off some steam.

"I can't believe it," one reporter bellowed.

"They treated us like dirt."

A second journalist piped up.

"We give them thousands of dollars of free publicity and they have the nerve to treat us like that."

The next day, I e-mailed John about the nasty incident, so he would be aware of the fact media types did not appreciate the way they were being treated.

In response, he zipped back a communication, in which he curtly informed me that my reservationn for a red carpet event the next night was cancelled because of a lack of space!

And, get this, he didn't even bother to respond to my complaint issues!

The next day - after a post I penned was published on the internet tossing the spotllight on the despicable behaviour of staff members (and guards) going down at AFI - he e-mailed a second communication noting that another reservation for the next night's screening was also cancelled due to a full house.

Well, I wasn't born yesterday, nor do I have stupid written across my forehead.

Fortunately, the films I was intent on screening, were part of the Envelope series sponsored by the daily paper (Los Angeles Times). 

So, I caught the flicks at the Landmark Theatre in West Los Angeles.

Betta!

I was treated well - (free soda and snacks) - and was among my "people" not jacka**es like Wildman.

Needless to say, I have not responded to any of their press notices since then, nor have I bothered to waste my professional time giving them any publicity for their festivals, top ten lists, or special functions.

Now that John Wildman has departed, I have informed AFI that I may consider covering their projects in the future once again.

Hopefully, Bob Gazalles - director of the AFI Fest in Los Angeles -will hire a professional, competent, and well-mannered individual capable of treating industry folks with a little more respect than the "Wild" man!

Like moi!

Kidding.

Earthlink...embezzles funds! Engages in fraud, breach of contract & false advertising!



Imagine this scenario!

After tracking down a web hosting plan that suits your budget - for approximately $20.00 a month, let's say - you proceed to explore the control panel at the new server to ready yourself for the painstaking task of designing, building, and publishing your web site.

When you stumble on the option to set alerts on the account, you input a request that a notice be sent out in the event you go over your monthly usage, to ultimately ensure that your remain within your budget for the project online.

At the suggestion of the web hosting company - in this instance, Earthlink - you agree to input your debit card information in their data base so that the monthly fee of may be deducted from your acccount without the necessity of writing and mailing in a check each month.

Afer a few months, the site is pretty well-developed, attracting traffic, and everything looks hunky-dorey.

Each month you've been billed the sum due without incident.

Then, out-of-the-blue one day, Earthlink informs you by snail mail that a charge in the sum of approximately $968.00 (and some change) has been returned from the bank unpaid.

Say what?

Obviously Earthlink has not only made a serious error, but acted illegally, for having tried to debit a charge in an excessive sum (1) without notice; (2) for a sum that was not due; (3) in violation of the terms of agreement (no notice was given that any surcharges were tacked on due to overlimit usage either).

Was it all a silly mistake, a typo perhaps?

In response, the account-holder mails out a letter objecting to the charge, on the grounds that no alert was sent.

In particular, the customer expresses their outrage about the illegal attempt to debit an excessive sum of approximately $969.00 from their bank account without legal notice or authority to charge the sum in question.

Earthlink fails to respond, so the customer assumes that  the error was corrected.

Not so fast!

Two weeks later, in spite of the fact Earthlink has not addressed the original complaint, the larcenous  web hosting company fires off a second billing notice alleging that the sum of approximately $1600.00 is now due.
Huh?

How is it possible for a monthly bill of $19.99 to jump to $969.00  in two short weeks, then to the outrageous astronomical sum of $1600.00 ten days later?

And, don't forget that alert!

There was no record of any alerts being e-mailed out as requested, or any proof of any Earthlink response to the allegations of breach of agreement, attempted embezzlement of funds, false advertising, and deceitful business practices.

Notwithstanding the failure to respond, address the issues - and so forth and so on - Earthlink once again attempted to debit without notice or legal authority to do so for the staggering sum of $2200.00.

Fortunately, the customer kept low-ball sums in the checking account, to prevent embezzlement of funds.

In addition to the headaches surrounding the dishonest illegal conduct of Earthlink, there is a second issue the web client must now contend with.

After months of developing the sight with thousands of man hours devoted to the cause, the individual must now relocate the site at considerabe effort (and additional costs), to another web hoster to escape the deceitful and dishonest clutches of the earthlink bank thieves.

In addition to the foregoing, it should be noted for the record, that the service provided was not even that professional or reliable.

Several times a week, the customer was forced to spend a hour or so with customer support online, to sort out problems that continued ad nauseam.

For example, oftentimes the customer and visitors to the site, were not able to access the web homepage, which according to an error message (a denial of access code) stated the site was not available due to a password requirement (???), site publishing errors, whatever.

Also, on dozens of ocasions, images failed to load properly on the web pages, which resulted in ugly gaping holes on the posts (which looked shoddy, unprofessional, and downright amateurish).

After six weeks, Earthlink continued to add surcharges, but as of this date has never met their burden to establish by virtue of accounting and proper documentation how the figures were tabulated.

In the end scenario, the customer was forced to close his bank account (after all, when he attempted to delete the credit card info from the web site data base, his efforts were blocked by dishonest Earthlink employees who obviously intended to keep trying debits with that card automatically until they hit pay dirt by a fluke).

And, get this, when the customer tried to transfer their domain name (which they owned) to another web host plan - Earthlink also blocked the ID code from releasing the site - even though they did not have the authority or legal right to do so.

Talk about scumbags!

Avoid these a**holes and their web hosting plans like the plague!!



CEO rip-off thief at Earthlink!


 
Custom Search