Saturday, October 10, 2009

Jay Leno Show...Wanda Sykes immigrant quote! HBO special...




That Wanda Sykes is a hoot!

Did you catch her monologue on Jay Leno the other night?

In one hilarious bit, the quirky comedienne joked about the bid to make marijuana legal in California, so the government impodr a tax - and likewise - profit from sales of the ubiquitious "killer" social weed during these tough economic times.

"Heck, they only allow us to water our lawns twice a week. How can they possibly cultivate any primo marijuana with that?"

On another occasion, she opted to use use the race card when faced with a problem to resolve with the big-chinned talk-show host with the infectious grin.

"We get to use two race cards a year since there is a Black president," she dead-panned to a roar from the rapt audience on the edge of their seat.

One of my favorite jokes was about day-workers in California.

"Things are so tough, that illegal immigrants are complaining that white folks are taking their jobs."

Ba-dump!

If you missed the schtick, then tune in tonight to HBO, and catch her special.

Titled - "Wanda Sykes: I'ma Be Me" - the live! performance was taped at the Warner Theatre in Washington (D.C.).

If you're sensitive to zany, off-beat - and/or slightly blue (!) material - then surf to re-runs of  The Waltons, Little House on the Prairie, or bill-of-fare like that!

Later.





Harrah's...Vegas Casino staff harass guests & Violate rights! Steer clear of these losers...


Tourist alert!




I was under the impression that Harrah's was one of those fun easy-going Casinos on the Vegas strip - devoid of drama - where locals and tourists, alike, casually popped in to guzzle down a thirst-quenching brewskie or two as they tried their luck at the slots.

After the disturbing "shake-down" I witnessed last night (October 10th) at Harrah's (across from Caesar's Palace) it became quite evident to me and a handful of other shocked guests - that if you weren't a regular face in the crowd known to management or a guest of  Harrah's Hotel - security (a posse of brazen yahoos with sh** for brains) would stalk 'ya, rudely interrupt an otherwise entertaining eve brimming with mirth and joy - and ultimately - end up casting a pall on the festivities because of their willful and wrongful  (illegal) conduct and rampant Violations of Civil Rights.

For example, a guest strolled into Harrah's early last evening to toss back a few, and savor a stress-free evening of carefree lesiure activity while on vacation in the desert oasis.

Shortly after the out-of-towner headed off  in search of a bar (and a slot machine with eye-catching visuals to wile an hour or two away with), he was suddenly taken aside (for no good reason) by a couple of scrappy-looking security (!) guards and asked to show I.D.

Because a Casino is private property, the guest was aware that he was required to show identification if requested, so - without batting-an-eye - he ceremoniously handed over the document once retrieved from an expensive wallet.

Also, it should be noted, that the gentleman was middle-aged, fashionably dressed, and a tad miffed at having his way "blockaded" in the fashion it was unexpectedly out-of-the-blue.

In fact, the well-heeled (educated ) man felt like he was being treated like a criminal, in view of the unwarranted inappropriate conduct of the security detail.

At this juncture, one of the interlopers asked the individual if he was a guest at the Hotel.

Do you have to be a guest at Harrah's to saunter in for a drinkie-poo, or toss a few coins in a one-armed bandict, for heaven's sake?

When he noted he wasn't staying at Harrah's, the guard proceeded to probe him further about his lodging arrrangements.

"What Hotel are you staying at?"

My jaw just about dropped to the floor!

Obviously, the low-life twosome spied the expensive watch and gold ring (set with a dazzling diamond in its face) the upscale gent was wearing.

Were they intending to drop by his Hotel later and rob him of his personal effects?

No?

Then, why the question!

I was truly flabberghasted when the next phase of the "improper" slip-shod illegal interrogation began.

"Did you drive or fly," the smelly guard with the leering eyes queried the startled guest further.

When the guest (who was getting a bit antsy now) noted that he drove, the a**hole actually insinuated that a trek over a long distance by vehicle to Las Vegas was somehow suspicious.

"That's a long drive," he growled back.

Is it against the law (or a felony, for that matter) to drive to Las Vegas for a holiday???

Golly, where was this jerk-off when God was handing out the grey matter, under a slimey rock?

Well, you only had to take a gander at these two losers, to fathom what their problem was.

Slovenly, with rolls of  fat cascaading over their worn (overly-cinched) belts screamed out it out!

Lazy pigs.

For starters!

But, the cavalier - illegal manner in which they overstepped their authority - was worse.

In sum, they were a couple of impotent dudes with psychological probems attempting to bolster their manhood by packing a gun, hiding behind a fake tin shield, and bullying the innocent.

To get their rocks off, no doubt.

Sick perverse pricks!

Curiously, the individual they were inclined to "pick on", was a well-known celebrity with friends in high places.

Were they ignorant of that fact?

If not, obviously their sole intention was to harass (and annoy) the individual-in-question (and others at Harrah's last night) for a stupid kick.

If that was the case, at least one individual who was needlessly annoyed and harassed, may be filing a complaint with the FBI to get to the bottom of it.

After al - these a-holes not only overstepped their bounds - but engaged in willful wrongful conduct beyond the scope of their legal authority.

For this reason, I am posting this consumer alert, so that my readers around the globe are forewarned about Harrah's - and likewise clued in - so they may be inclined to alight at an establishment in Las Vegas where the staff (and owners) treat everyone with dignity and respect.

Amen!




Friday, October 9, 2009

Barack Obama...he lied! Senator call a spade a spade...








When one of the Senators heckled the President on Capitol Hill a few weeks ago in the midst of an important speech - and howled out two infamous little words (you lie!) that turned the political world on its ear - he was at a loss to utter up a response.

Was he so taken aback by the rude interruption that it jolted him to the very fibre of his being?

Or, was there another reason why he remained "mum"?

In a few days, pundits (and angry political opponents)  may be lamenting to all within earshot - on frenzied media airwaves and off - that Barack Obama wasn't truthful.

In fact, in retrospect - the Senator (all things considered)  - it appears the political upstart may have simply called a "spade a spade".

If you recall, in order to placade his opponents on the issue of Health Insurance reform, Barack Obama alleged bold-face that illegal immigrants would not receive any medical benefits under any new bill before the house and senate.

But, the truth of the matter is, that under the U.S. Constitution hospitals would be required to provide medical care to illegal immigrants.

The issue(s) have already been challenged in two courts:  one (Prop 27) in California in respect to medical benefits; another, in Texas on the subject of entitlement of education to illegals.

Under the "Equal Protection" clause of the U.S. Constitution, all persons are guaranteed protection..

And, that protection does not stipulate that the person be a U.S. citizen or a legal immigrant to the entitlement.

Some say, that Barack Obama (who studied Constitutional Law) was aware of the fact, but deceitfully played dumb.

Why?

To pass the buck, of course.

If there is ever a challenge to a Health Reform bill, the government will simply send it on to the courts - and ultimately if it ends up at the Supreme Court - the Justices will have to play the role of "boogie man" (not clever Barack Obama).

Sly devil!






Palace Station (Las Vegas)...squeaky wheel gets oil! Tattler "Seal of Approval"...





If you recall, I posted a consumer alert on "The Tattler" this past week, when Palace Station (Las Vegas) was inclined to charge a Hotel guest resort fees at check-in in spite of the fact the fees were not openly (or clearly) disclosed on Expedia's (booking agent) web site.

Post::  10/06/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/palace-stationvegas-hotel-in-thick-with.html

Today, there is a happy ending to the vacation drama!

Shortly after I published the post at this site, Palace Station management charged back and issued credit to the Hotel guest, with obvious apologies for the misunderstanding.

Yup!

The squeaky wheel gets the oil.

The Palace Station gets kudos for responding quickly and professionally to the issue in favor of guest satsifaction.

In addition, I should like to point out that the traveller was also thrilled with the reasonable-priced attractive lodging.

For four days the out-of-towner slept soundly on a comfy King Size bed.

And, the sumptuous room was not only elegantly decorated, but also included amenities such as steam iron, Internet access and wide-screen Television, for starters.

The suite was situated on the 1st floor on the picturesque courtyard, too.

"I just had to trot a few steps to take a dip in the pool or relax in the hot tub each evening."

The "Palace Station" Hotel & Casino is now the 1st recipient of the Tattler's golden "Seal Of Approval".




New Beverly Cinema...Fright Night! All night horror-film line-up...




Friends at the New Beverly Cinema are gearing up for an all-night horror extravaganza this weekend.

For those of you who have already caught Zombieland, a trek to the Art House at 7:30 p.m. on Saturday, might just creepy alternative bill-of-fare right up your frightful alley at the witching hour & beyond to the crack of the Vampire blood-sucking stalking dawn.

Included in the 12-hour marathon are delectable offerings such as "The Burning", "Dog Soldiers", and the "House by the Cemetery".

Positively ghoulish, eh?

The annual event is actually a fundraiser to rustle up moolah so that the doors at one of the city's oldest revival houses may remain open.

Think "options".

Classic films, documentaries, insightful Q & A sessions with top film directors in tow.

That's what your cash forward can do.

Save a cultural ICON in trendy WeHo!

See 'ya there.

*If  I'm back from the Desert Oasis that is
!



Barack Obama...Nobel Peace Prize! On dubious grounds...


Peaceful is as peaceful does!



At the crack of dawn the White House press secretary was roused by the loud ring-a-ding-ding of a telephone.

No, it wasn't General McChystal,  inviting Barack out for a morning jog with a bit of male bonding in mind.

Officials were calling long-distance from Denmark to inform the President (and the missus) that the Prez's nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize prevailed.

When the news began to zig-zag around the corridors of power on Capitol Hill, some were inclined to shake their heads in disbelief.

A Nobel Peace!

For what?

Indeed, the unexpected windfall fell into Obama's lap at a time when voters and politicians (on both sides of the floor) were deriding the President for flip-flopping on policy, being  wishy-washy (falling short of any defining action on pressing issues in respect to Health Care and the Military, for starters), and not following through on campaign promises.

After a bit of relection, it appears the coveted prize may have been bestowed on the President for a myriad of reasons - which may include - the following:

Bombing the moon
(to appease water-bottlers seeking novel liquid products to boost the economy)
Name-calling
(putting a fellow Politician in his place by labelling him a jacka**)
* Wearing "Mom" Jeans
(with little or no embarassment and to engender (!) the queering of our youth)
Setting the Military straight about  "who's the boss"
(thus ending the mother of all conflicts)

Surely, you don't concur with the overseas Committee, that Barack Obama was entitled to be receipient of the  honor because of  "extradordinary efforts to strengthen International diplomacy and cooperation"?

Especially when you consider one over-riding fact.

 Barack Obama was only in office for approximately two weeks (accomplishing didley-squat) when the nomination for consideration was submitted to the Committee in Denmark just shy of the deadline in February.

Was someone jumping the - um - gun?

Barack Obama is one of three sitting Presidents in U.S. History to have received the honor.

In the case of the two other honorees, each was a seasoned politician,  with years of glowing accomplishments under their belts.

Does this Nobel Peace Prize pass the smell taste?

No matter.

Barack's critics (and hateful opponents) are eating crow!

Yum!




Toeing the line in Washington!


Thursday, October 8, 2009

Michael Jackson...motive for murder! Grand Jury to review evidence according to TMZ...





Face of murderer?





TMZ reported on air last night that a high-level Law Enforcement contact at the LAPD whispered in their ear that the Michael Jackson case is heading for the Grand Jury.

The question at this point, according to lawyer Harvey Levin, is not whether he will be charged - but rather - on what grounds (manslaughter or 2nd degree).

Curiously, it was recently reported in a desert oasis daily that an arrest warrant has also been urged for the good doctor - Conrad Murray - after he failed to put in an appearance for a hearing in respect to child support issues (back payments due) before the courts now.

Murray owes approximately $13,000.00 to a woman by the name of Nenita Malibriran (who is the mother of the child).

In addition, according to public records, Murray has defaulted on his mortgage at Red Rock Country Club and owes approximately $31,332.00 in unpaid student loans for medical school and more than $373,700.00 in judgments from lawsuits against him or his business (!).

On another front, at least three daily newspapers have petitioned the courts to unseal the search warrants issued after Michael Jackson's death.

At this juncture, lawyers for the journalists are arguing that revealing the contents of the files would not jeopardize the investigation which has been ongoing (especially in view of numerous leaks from the LAPD)  for several months now.

In particular, a pitch has been made in respect to the public's right to know, as evidenced the following statement submitted to the court(s) by concerned lawyers:

"The public has great interest in learning about the progres of the investigation into Mr. Jackson's death, and about the government's justification for searching Dr. Conrad Murray's Las Vegas residence and office, and for searching the pharmacy that allegedly sold the drugs administered to Jackson prior to his death."

Today, something suddenly clicked in my own mind, in regard to Dr. Conrad Murray.

There may be a motive for murder!


If  you recall, LaToya Jackson allegeded (some thought wildly) that over a million dollars in cash and jewels were missing from Michael Jackson's safe.

Nay-sayers pooh-poohed the "notion" of foul play.

"She's wacko," they chortled as they dismissed her in disgust.

But, now, there is a real possiblity - that there was a theft - which may have been the motive for Michael's murder!

Stay tuned as the murderous drama unfolds at The Tattler!



TMZ...James Caan homo slur slap in face to Levin! Sex harassment at tabloid news outlet...





A couple of the TMZ "kids" - in search of a scoop - spied James Caan sauntering out of a trendy watering hole looking a little worse for wear last night and ventured forth with high hopes.

The response the "Vegas" actor spat in their shocked faces was more than they bargained for!

When queried (bad choice of words, I expect) about his thoughts on the brewing Letterman sex scandal, the aging thespian growled back at the gossip tipsters without so much as batting a weary eye:

"It's not as bad as screwin' guys."

Ouch!

Back at the TMZ studio, Harvey Levin was smarting from the hateful remark.

Was Levin the intended target?

"Not cool," the lawyer winced.

A pall fell over the room.

Frankly, I was surprised by the slur.

You'd think that after all the years Caan has toiled away in show business in Hollywood (where fags run rampant around movie sets a-dime-a-dozen daily) that he would be a little more accepting and open-minded than that!

A boycott of Caan films coming down the pike?

Just betcha!

By the way, Levin may also be staring a sexual harassment suit in the face, along the lines of the one that Letterman is grappling with just now.

In one segment of the highly-rated gossip tabloid show, a fresh-faced blond (male) cutie (boasting a lot of on-camera time in the TMZ limelight) let it slip that Levin still hadn't returned a shirt he borrowed from the cub reporter.

Say what?

Another staffer (a plump likable kid with a sad puppy-dog face) jumped on it.

"Heh, didn't you guys pick up on that?  They're sharing shirts."

Levin's faced turned beet red.

Uh-huh!

A little bit of office politics gone too far?

News on Katie Couric's show at 11!





Dave Letterman...Katie Couric news flash! Talk show host a Prince or letch?

1st Dude of talk-show circuit!



Nice package, dude!
Is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?




The Letterman affair soared to a fever pitch last night as everyone tried to grab a piece of the action!

Industry analysts, legal eagles, and a posse of anchors - and their well-heeled guests - chatted each other up incessantly (non-stop) as the sex scandal at CBS (The Late Show) continued to titillate viewers around the country.

To some, Dave was a Prince (in view of the way he handled the tawdry airing of his dirty laundry under close scrutiny in the glare of the public spotlight).

To others, he was just another aging letch trolling the office environs for easy prey.

At one point, the Jay Leno Show was interrupted by a sizzling news flash!

"Dave Letterman's been gettting such high ratings that Katie Couric has been approaching staff  to have sex with her," the announcer stridently belted out over the airwaves with an urgency that was hard to resist.

News at 11!

No kidding!

Meanwhile, over at the Joy Behar talk show, there was another dialogue going down with the hostess-with-the-mostest and her - um - self.

Speaking point blank into the camera, she mused half-jokingly.

"Heh, I need the ratings. Maybe there's someone cutie around here I can hook up with," she confided in so many words, to her die-hard fans out in TV-land.

When the camera fell on a two-hundred-and-fifty pound cameraman, though, Joy openly balked!

"Sorry, I have standards, 'ya know."

Which begs the question.

What kind of standard got the juices flowin' in Letterman's groins?

Just betcha, it was the typical male one, which consists of two criteria.

One, that the body be warm.

Two, that it be "moving".



Attractive Cougar seeks opportunistic stud!


Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Roman Polanski...flight risk auteur denied "get out of jail free" card! Swiss tighten noose...

Send me no flowers, please!




Fearing that Roman Polanski might flee their jurisdiction if released, Swiss Officials elected - instead - to deny the celebrated film director's request to be released on his own recognizance or on bail until the issue of extradition to the U.S. is resolved.

According to spokesman Folco Galli, at the Swiss Justice Ministry, the flight-risk threat was too great for the Government to even consider the possibility of a release backed by heavy securities.

Consequently, the alleged rapist (who fled from a court's jurisdiction rather than face sentence for the felony crime over three decades ago) shall remain in custody much to his chagrin and that of a posse of supporters coralled by Debra Winger.

On the heels of the decision, Polanski's lawyers appealed to Switzerland's Federal Criminal Court,  with a plea to free the known fugitive from justice.

In a sort of tit-for-tat, the Justice Ministry has lodged a response with the tribunal, stating the grounds for their decision to refuse bail and the subsequent release of the Academy Award-winning Director.

And so, the drama drags on.



Academy award-winner!

Dave Letterman...Viagra, Paul Schaffer & smooch from KISS! Keep it up, Dave...







Dave Letterman's love affair with the viewing audience (and in-house ring-siders at the live taping) continued last night while the storm of controversy over the sex scandal swirled around elsewhere on other networks and cable news outlets.

Yes, Dave was in a jovial mood.

Shortly, after he trotted out on stage to a warm welcome, he uttered his first words.

"Oh, there's nothing like a new applause sign."

A nod to moi, no doubt!

Post:  10/06/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/david-lettermanaudience-roars-approval.html

Without much hestitation, the late-night funnyman launched into his opening dialogue, with a handful of  hilarious one-line zingers.

But, not a peep about the extortion case, to the surpise of some.

Not me!

No doubt, Dave's lawyers cautioned him to put a lid on it.

After all, legal counsel for the defendant (who was allegedly behind the extortion attempt last week) has stated his intention to focus on sexual harassment issues as part of his client's defense in the upcoming legal proceedings.

Some are speculating that there may be a messy long-drawn-out battle ahead for Dave in the courts, in fact.

Maybe that's why Dave (tongue-in-cheek)  introduced his "stand in" last eve.

"In the event something happens to me. Or, I can't be here for some reason."

Although Dave apologized to Sarah Palin on Tuesday night about a prior jab (on October 6th),  he was in the thick of his wicked pokes again, nonetheless, when he joked to the audience that one of the things folks would rather do than read her new book was surely "drink their own pee".

Yup, a few stomachs turned when the graphic flashed up on a wide video screen in living color.

There was a cute comment about the Late Show's environs, too.

Isn't the Ed Sullivan Theatre a beaut, he noted in so many words, after underscoring that a large number of theatres in the Tin Pan alley area of  NYC were normally crummy run-down joints.

"At the late show, the theatre is great. But, the production is nothing."

Hardly!

Once again, the show proved to be well-written, and all the edgy material delivered up with great finesse, in large part due to Dave's keen comedic timing.

Some of the funniest moments unfolded when Dave tossed the spotlight on his bandleader, Paul Schaffer.

Schaffer recently penned a bio which hit the bookstores yesterday, so he was inclined to take the hot seat for a few moments and share a dollop of the juicy tidbits within its hard covers (consisting of a handful of scintillating showbiz recollections culled from thirty years plus in the music biz).

Schaffer is a great story teller.

For example, his recollection of  the original "dismal" release of -  "It's Raining Men" - (which he co-wrote with Paul Jabarra) was downright hilarious.

Apparently, the tune was originally written for Donna Summer who was top Disco Queen in those heady days of Studio 54 back in the eighties.

But, when the songwriters approached Ms. Summer to record the song, she balked at signing a pact.

If you recall, the songbird became a born-again Christian - and subsequently - incurred the rath of homos all-the-world-over when she denounced the gay lifestyle after raking in millions of the green leafy stuff by virtue of her ICON status in gays nightclubs across the U.S.A.

Before you could utter-up "traitor bitch", disgruntled fans across the country sprang into action.

Within hours of the stunning (hurtful) announcement, unhappy disco Queens (of the male persuasion) were burning her LP's, or tossing 'em in the trash.

Her career as a performer has never regained footing in the music biz since that disasterous day many moons ago when she stepped into a whole heap-load of judgmental sh**.



So, as the tawdry tale goes, Jabarra called up Paul one day to inform him that he located two dynamite torch-singers (Two Tons of Fun) to not only record the catchy tune with the danceable beat, but perform it at the upcoming Gay Pride celebration in Central Park.

"I tell 'ya, those gals weighed about a ton, too," he chuckled.

When Schaffer was invited to the festivities, he wondered aloud a bit about the pro's and con's of attending.


Wasn't gay pride an angry sort-of militant event with gays protesting and all that?

But, as he noted on Letterman last night, because he was quite liberal and open-minded, he was inclined to give it a shot (gosh, I always thought he was one of the girls, didn't you?).

Also, his girlfriend (who he has since married), cautioned him about appearing.

"Do you really want your photograph taken at a Gay Pride Celebration in New York?  It may come back to haunt you."

What really hurt?

His gal-pal hated the tune!

"Raining men?  What the heck were you thinking?"

So, Schaffer rang up Paul Jabarra, and begged off.

However, as it turned out, the lovebirds were already booked for a bicycle-ride through the park that day.

Around five o'clock that afternoon,  Paul happened to glance at his watch, and suddenly realized that the concert was just about to rev up on stage.

With a bit of arm-twisting, he managed to lure his girlfriend to the crest of a hill where they could have take in the concert from afar (and out of sight).

Right off-the-bat, he spied a heavyset dyke waving a large sign and screaming out at the top of her lungs:

"We're everywhere. We're everywhere."

Paul was aghast at what went down after that.

Shortly after the gals started to belt out the tune - and the muscle man on stage began flexing a bicep or two - the crowd booed!

Just goes to show 'ya, songs are not always a bona fide hit when they're first released, eh?

The bit about Britney Spears was a big guffaw,  too.

Paul noted that his band usually does a fun "twist" on a song - somehow tied to a guest - when he or she strides out from behind the curtain to take their seat next to Dave on the Late Show.

For example, when Jeff Goldblum made an entrance one night, the band played a tune from the soundtrack of a well-known film the actor starred in - "The Fly".

When Paul was informed that Britney Spears was going to pop in to visit Dave from a sound stage she was performing on next door to his studio, the talented composer hit on the idea to play the old classic hit:

"Thanks for the Memories"

"That was a Bob Hope thing, you know, stopping in from the set next door."

Concerned that Britney might not get "it", he seized on the opportunity to explain the details beforehand, when he casually passed her by in the hall by chance.

When Paul mentioned Bob Hope, her face went blank.

"Bob, who?"

At this point, the musician elaborated a bit, but it was evident he was not getting through.

Then, a lightbulb seemed to go on inside the sexy hottie's precious head.

"Oh, you're Dave's DJ, aren't you?"

Duh!

If you're like me, you probably make a mad dash from the TV set at commercial break, to take a whiz and snatch up a brewskie and snacks before the next segment of the Late Show starts up on the old boob tube.

Last night, I didn't want to miss one second of the show, so I stocked up in advance so that all my goodies would be within easy reach in my Hotel room as I viewed the CBS broadcast.

Consequently, I ended up taking in the commercials, which I never normally do.

Was it a wicked coincidence?

Last night one of the sponsors for Letterman's Late Show was Viagra!

In view of the sex scandal, and the age of our lovable Lothario, I thought the product tie-in was bang (!) on.

I laughed out loud when I heard the disclaimer (broadcast in almost a whisper underneath the visuals) which cautioned:

"If you experience an erection for more than four hours call your doctor right away."

You betcha!

To get a refill on the prescription!

But, the coincidences did not end there, though.

In an upcoming commercial spot later on during the show, there was also an advertisement touting the wonders of another boner-builder by the product name of Cialis.

The announcer noted (with both a straight face and di**?) that  there were two options for the discerning male to pin his hope - um - chest on.

One dose for an evening's romp - for quick in 'n outs - I expect.

A second to span over an uninterrupted thirty-six hour period.

Obviously, the latter is suited to Dave, because of his long hours on the set at CBS.

After all, who wants to encounter pecker trouble on the verge of a backstage tryst?

Of course, with Dave's big bucks, he could afford a fluffer.

So, maybe that rumor about a hidden "love nest"  backstage is not just malicious gossip.

News at 11!






Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Barack Obama...is the honeymoon over? Mojo not juicing the voters...

Would real Obama step forward!


After "Saturday Night Live" took a jab at President Obama on the weekend, frenzied speculation wildly broke out on both sides of the political landscape - from voters, too - on the subject of Obama's future in the oval office.

Has Barack Obama lost his MoJo, some wondered aloud to anyone within earshot?

One pundit's quip was quick and biting.

"I never bought into the cool-aid from the beginning."

In a sketch on the highly-rated popular SNL variety show, one of the regulars put on a pair of floppy ears, and started in on schtick - that some say - was a tell-tale sign that the President's popularity is on the skids.

On the contrary, Barack's approval rating has gone up a few percentage points over the past week or so.

"Oh, that's just because of the Leno shows and stuff like that," one snide critic pooh-poohed.

Others lamented that it was a sad state of affairs when a political party cheers the loss of a bid for the Olympics, let's say, because it was a project a President (they fiercely oppose and would like to oust from office) sought to snatch up with pride for the benefit of his political cronies and supportive voters from his windy home town.

To some, the sketch missed its mark.

"Comedy is supposed to be based in truth. That is what makes it funny."

Another individual vigorously argued that Barack was only in office for approximately eight months, had irons in the fire, yes - but could not be expected to accomplish the goals in the first stretch of his Presidency so soon.

He may be the Savior in some folks eyes, but he is not Superman, after all.

Good points, all.

As to the issue of the honeymoon being over, well, in my opinion it was never really consumated.

I expect that come next election, the voters and Barack Obama will part ways amicably, on the grounds of irreconcilable differences.

One main gripe is that Obama opens his yap a lot, but doesn't follow through with any defining action.

Supporters blame some of his failures (the Olympic bid, for instance) on George W. Bush.

Two or three hardcore fans allege that over the past eight years Georgie-boy damaged the name and reputation of the great United States around the planet during his reign of terror  (um) power that it has made it difficult for Obama to surmount that obstacle.

Yeah, it's been a wacky week.

Especially when you consider one plot that a pundit alleged was underfoot.

Allegedly, Barack has been pushing for the Health Insurance Reform so that the United States will be on the same socialist footing that the European Nations are.

Of course, that equates to paid vacations, health insurance for all, high taxes.

No complaints!

The spirited young crazy finished up his view of things by noting that all of this was in keeping with Barack's plans for a World-Government  (and a Savior of some kind to head it up, naturally).

OMG!

Sounds like the final verses of the Bible, Revelations, are unfolding before our very eyes.

"He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name."

"This calls for wisdom."

" If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number."

"His number is 666."




Palace Station...Vegas Hotel in thick with fraudulent scams perpetrated by Expedia! Staff rude & insulting to guests...





On the current jaunt to Las Vegas - in view of the troubled economy and ongoing reports in the media in recent days that there are bargains galore to be had in the Desert Oasis - I was inclined to sample a couple of the local Hotels and pass on the inside scoop on the findings to avid blog readers.

First up, Palace Station, situated on Sahara Boulevard (just off the Vegas strip).

When the weary traveller approaches the Hotel, they can't help but be struck by the fact that the twenty-year fixture on the Vegas scene, it is a bit of a grand old lady.

Inside, the environs have been kept pretty well-maintained, too.

No frayed carpets here!

In spite of the fact the Casino area is spacious, the front lobby where the Reservation desk is located, is relatively modest and low-key.

All in all, first impressions are great, until there is an interchange with the front desk staff at check-in.

When a guest presents their confirmation number for their hotel booking, they are curtly informed that there will be also be a $16.00 plus charge known (and referred to as) a "resort fee".

Hold on a minute, lady!

The Palace Station a not a "resort" by any stretch of the imagination.

For the most part, though, the guest is angry because the charges were not disclosed by the booking agent, when the reservation was made online with Expedia (dot com).

When the guest produces an e-mail confirmation that verifies there was no disclosure about the resort fee (there is no reference to any such charge on the document - or likewise - any notice that such a fee may be due at check-in), the disgruntled tourist expects the fee to be waived in view of the misunderstanding (or downright fraud involved in respect to the failure to disclose).

But, is taken aback, when that is not the way it pans out.

A snippy twenty-something female staff at the front desk proceeds to act in a rude and insulting manner.

No, the Hotel can not waive the fee.

When a supervisor stepped outside his cubicle to assist her with the disputed issue, he actually made an implied threat in order to coerce the guest into paying the fee.

If you don't check in, and pay the resort fee, you may not get a refund on the 4 days you paid upfront for the Hotel reservation.

Fortunately, during the course of this mean-spirited discourse, the dim-witted employees let it slip that the Hotel was constantly having this problem with - tourists, businessmen, and the like - when reservations were made through Expedia.

Ah-ha.

Then why didn't the Palace Station take some action on the issue?

When I put the question to one of the front desk Managers - Joe Saldana - he shrugged.

"They send us a lot of business."

Gotcha!

Because the Hotel was aware of the problem - and the willful non-disclosure of  fees (and to date failed to make any good-faith effort to eradicate the fraudulent practice) -  the guest now argued that the Hotel was legally bound to waive the fees.

But, even Joe Saldana - who appeared at first glance to be willing to work with the guest - wouldn't go that route without a compromise of some sort in the Hotel's favor.

How about paying half the fees?

Finally, the guest relented, but with the provisio that they would approach Expedia for a reimbursement.

Mr. Saldana's eyes went wide.

Personally, I have booked many Hotel rooms on Expedia over the past year.

On occasion, I have spied a notice indicating that a surcharge "may" be charged by the Hotel at check-in (or at check-out).

But, when I trotted up to check in - let's say at the Greek Isles Hotel & Casino  (I shall be reporting on this charming little respite in the next few days)  for example - the establishment did not charge me any resort fees.

In fact, I've never been billed for such a charge at the Plaza, Binion's, Circus Circus, Seigel Suites, to name a few.

Recently, it came to my attention, though, that the Sahara was failing to disclose the resort fee until guests checked in at the front desk. 

Consequently, I penned a consumer alert which was summarily published on my personal web site.

http://www.julianayrs.com/

I have also noticed in recent weeks that Expedia and a handful of other sites - Orbitz, Hotwire, PriceLine - are deceitful in respect to the way fees, taxes, and surcharges are posted on their web sites.

Bargain prices are posted in bold type so they are noticed right away when an online visitor surfs to the site.

But, in order to attract - and subsequently "lure" unsuspecting tourists to Hotels of their choosing with questionable surcharges - they bury the details (the ifs, ands, and buts) somewhere in a deep link or hidden in fine print on the web site somewhere away from the initial cost info.

In the case of the aforementioned guest, the surcharge was not immediately apparent.

And, when the e-mail confirmation of the hotel reservation arrived without any reference to the surcharge, the consumer assumed that their room charge, fees and taxes, were all paid in full.

Wouldn't you be miffed to arrive and find that you had to pay an additional $16 a night?

The failure to disclose was bad enough, but the way the guest was treated in the throes of attempting to sort out the misunderstanding, was both shocking and unacceptable for any legitimate Hotel that purports to be an upstanding professional business concern.

Shame on the Palace Station!

Tomorrow, I report on a security problem at Circus Circus.

'Til then.

Footnote
The dispute was recently resolved in favor of the Hotel guest.
Post: 10/09/2009
http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/palace-station-las-vegassqueaky-wheel.html




David Letterman...audience roars approval! Sarah Palin apology surprise...




Doesn't Dave know I'm not into "Daddy" types?




Last night Dave Letterman strolled out from behind the curtain and was met with a prolonged roar of approval from his in-house audience.

Of course, there was no need for a stage manager to stand in the dark on the sidelines with an "applaud" prompt sign (usually a tool used to rustle up on-camera reaction in a live taping session like Dave's), for obvious reasons.

Die-hard fans, out-of-towners, tourists - and a handful of the curious - turned out to not only show their support for the likeable talk-show host in the wake of the shocking breaking news about an extortion attempt - but to be privy to the latest salicious tidbits in the event Dave chose to discuss the scandal further.

Would he?

More like, did he!

Once the loud chorus of cheers and wild applause died down, Dave chuckled, then off-handedly quipped that it had been a long weekend.

"It was chilly outside. It was chilly inside."

He joked that he busied himself  by raking his hate mail.

That wasn't the extent of the fallout, though, according to Letterman.

The woman on the navigator device on his vehicle wouldn't speak to him when he revved up the engine earlier that morning, for starters!

At one point, he offered up another joke farther afield, that was fueled by his own shake-down.

"It was revealed today that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's is Jewish.  I wonder how much money they would demand to keep that a secret?"

The audience went crazy!

There were serious moments, too, when Dave openly admitted that his wife was horribly hurt by the scandal.

He noted that something needed "fixing" and that he had his work cut out for him if he was to accomplish that task.

Applause!

At this juncture, he apologized to his staff for placing them such an awkward situation - which he assured the folks in the bleachers (and the at-home viewing audience) - was unintentional.

In so many words, the late-night funnyman noted that it never occurred to him that his indiscretions may have a negative impact on staff toiling away in the office/studio environment daily.

Earlier in the evening, Larry King broadcast a segment on sexual harassment in the workplace, which was quite in-depth, insightful, and thought-provoking in respect to those issues, by the way.

One guest noted that Letterman's conduct was questionable because it may have impacted female staff members in a myriad of unpleasant and/or damaging ways.

For example, he wondered aloud if a tryst with Letterman may have ended up propelling an individual into the limelight (more on-camera air-time, let's say, for argument's sake) or maneuvering an opportunist up the ladder in the workplace.

In that event, an employee who may have passed on (or rejected) the "boss's" advance, may be forced to have negative second thoughts about "non-compliance".

Looking back, would a vulernable woman also kick herself,  for not taking advantage of the overture?

In the alternative, there was a real possibility (in the mind's eye of the legal analysts) that an individual may end up feeling they had been discriminated against (albeit a twisted form of it, in my estimation).

For this reason, there was speculation among the Larry King guests, that someone may come out of the wood-work now (or in the near future) to seize the day.

Payback!

At this juncture, Dave was criticized by the pundits for always going to the "well" in his office pool, too.

"There are so many beautiful women appearing as guests on his show. Why doesn't he try to hook up with them," one quizzed King.

My jaw dropped.

Up until this point, the arguments made sense.

But, really, can you imagine what kind of scandal would erupt if  Dave was caught hitting on female guests in the green room or backstage?

Talk about getting your di** caught in a wringer!

By the way, it was recently determined from a poll, that Letterman's production offices (and studio environs) were very female friendly.

Uh-huh!

Curiously, I noticed right off-the-bat - that when Dave appeared on stage in his impecably-tailored dark blue suit, pristine white shirt, and striped rep tie - that he was sporting white socks with loafers!

I laughed out loud.

In my post yesterday, I noted that one armchair critic characterized Dave's behaviour in the wake of the his fall from Grace, as "jockular".

Post:  10/05/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/david-lettermanstiff-di-has-no.html

Was this a subtle response by Letterman, I wonder?

By the way, last night's show was top-notch.

In fact, the sketches - and line-up of guests - proved to be quite an entertaining bill-of-fare.

I considered the possibility that the material was punched up a little just prior to showtime in view of the fact there would obviously be a large audience tuning in last night to catch more of the ongoing extortion saga.

Shortly after the thought crossed my mind, Martin Short appeared unexpectedly on stage, and joined good friend Steve Martin (a guest on the show).

Steve quipped:

"I knew you couldn't stay away since you knew the ratings were going to be quite high tonight."

There were some funny bits.

One, hit a little close to home, in a subliminal (what would Freud say?) way.

When Steve Martin pulled out his banjo and started to pluck the strings, the lights went down.

Then, at the tail end of the piece, fireworks unexpectedly exploded out of the neck of the instrument.

Suggestive, n'est-ce pas?

What's in Dave's bag of tricks tonight?

I hazard a guess that viewers will be tuning in with bated breath.

And, to rock to the sounds of  KISS, no doubt.



Jewish?



KISS guests on Late Show tonight!

Monday, October 5, 2009

Plastic Ono Band...message from Yoko!





Twitter pal - Yoko Ono - recently flashed off some thoughts by e-mail that I thought I would share with you verbatim:

Dear Friends,

Just before the worldwide announcement of the economic shock, my son announced the birth of a music company called CHIMERA. Nice name. The first sound Ki, is Ki:Air, and the minute you pronounce that syllable, you feel the power of Ki.

Music world was at the lowest point then. Many music related outfits were closing down. So why a new company? We all wondered what my son thought he was doing. Is he going crazy? But when I looked closely into what he was doing, I suddenly realized that he was attempting to create a kind of revolution in the music world. It was a quiet manifesto of a young producer trying to change the system for the better. Oh, that's where he's going? I was shocked.

It reminded me of what I did in Chambers Street Concert Series 50 odd years ago. It also was John and me, how we went gung-ho about our ideas and went with all of them, no matter what. The blood is speaking, I thought. The son is wearing a suit. We wore beatnik black and then hippy blue. But the spirit seems to not have died. It may have gotten stronger, in fact. In those days, the music world was not so controlled corporatively and legally. So it wasn't difficult to cut through to try to change the scene. It's a harder game now.

I recorded and gave two new songs to Chimera to celebrate the beginning of it's musical voyage. Then Sean said I should do my next album with Chimera. I thought, OKAY. In a real world, jumping into making an album with your son, is probably a no, no move for a mother to take. If it's all alright, then fine. But once there is an argument, it may get out of hand. But those things hadn't occurred to me. It seemed like a beautiful wide road was presented to me, and I would be a fool to not take it.

The sessions went more than great. We both learnt about each other in the way we haven't ever, by learning to respect each other's musicianship. I thought I was taking a big chance. But instead, I saw that we were creating miracles. I not only found out that my son was a brilliant music man, but he knew how to deal with musicians. Encouraging them while he got them to do what he had wanted them to do, kinda thing. Which is a normal thing all producers do. But seeing your son do it was like seeing the NY City for the first time. Even with me, he was his professional self- saying good morning and rushing to me to hug me when I arrive at the studio. When did I see him do that, except when he was five, maybe, I thought.

We communicated on the most intricate level of musical exchange. It was intense - night and day. And never a bad word passed between us.

It relaxed me, too, to be part of Chimera. Because, unlike the scenes I was use to travelling, the group of Chimera musicians are all songwriters of the future. And it's nice to know that I am one, too. Well, I am, baby. Don't have any doubts about that one!

It's also an honour bestowed on you by your son that he wanted to do yours first. Well, if you think that's saying a bit much... give me two names of a son and a mother doing something like this... And we are speaking of a very difficult mother and son, each with own firm musical ideas. I think Sean had courage in thinking he wanted to do this.

The fact that he knew every song I wrote and remembered the intros, was a surprised to me, since John and I made a big effort in not letting our son be burdened with the memory of our music. So he did listen... without telling us... These are things I wish I could report to John. He would have loved it.

One night, I was lying down on the sofa in the studio, trying to catch a catnap. I suddenly noticed that somebody quietly covered me with a khaki army surplus coat. That was exactly what John did when we were going through a long recording session one night. The coat was that coat, except that this one was a bit new and a bit hard on my skin. I looked up, and it was Sean who was doing exactly what John did. It was really a weird moment for me. For me to say John was probably there, is so predictable. But I really wondered.

Sean is still acting like most people of his generation. When he visits his mom, he sits in his favorite sofa and start communicating with somebody on the other end of his blackberry. So I feel very lucky that I saw the other side of him. The one who can say good morning, and hug his mom, when he's on his job. Thank you son, I'm already missing the sessions. It's been great.

love, yoko







Lady Gaga...bows out of tour with Kanye West! SNL performance ho-hum...




Kayne West and Lady Gaga were slated to hit the concert trail in November, but the latest news from the Vamp's camp is that the two have parted ways.

Just as well, Kayne probably would have kept popping up on stage unexpectedly throughout the tour,  to grab the mic, and sing the praises of other seductive songbirds!

In spite of the falling out, which both swear has been amicable, Lady Gaga has been quick on the uptake.

At Billboard's annual "Women in Music" event (where Gaga - the flavor of the month - received the Rising Star honor) , a spokesperson enthusiastically announced that Lady Gaga will strike out on her own come November.

Meanwhile, Live Nation assured ticket-holders who snapped up seats for the Kanye West/Lady Gaga extravaganza,  that refunds would be forthcoming.

Yeah, the check is in the mail.

Whew!

A word to Lady Gaga, though.

If the performance on Saturday Night Live is any indication of  what to expect in your live! much-anticipated upcoming concerts, then you'd better pack it in now.

For the record, your appearance was just plain old ho-hum, dahling!

Here's a fun take-off  of  "poker face" by sexy multi-talented transgender actress Candis Cayne (Dirty Sexy Money):

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/05/candis-caynedoes-lady-ga-ga-abbey.html

See 'ya at the Abbey soon, eh?




David Letterman...stiff di** has no conscience! Welcome to club, Dave...






On Thursday evening on The Late Show, Dave Letterman turned the glare of the spotlight on his own personal life, and fessed up to a stunned in-house audience that he engaged in extramarital afairs with staff members at his production company.

On the heels of that startlng revelation, the toothy talk show host confided to all within earshot that as a result of his indiscretions, there was also an attempt by a work associate to extort "hush money" to the tune of $2 million or thereabouts.

I am inclined to agree with one journalist, who reported in a morning daily on the weekend, that Letterman handled the matter with as much candor as possible, given the circumstances.

He was honest, self-effacing, and straightforward about the facts.

During the unprecedented segment, the sixty-something comic described the whole sordid turn of events as a scary episode in his life, which shook him up to the very timber of his soul.

"I was worried for myself. I was worried for my family.  I felt menaced by this and that I had to them all of the creepy things that I had done," he confided to the stunned audience on hand that day for the taping of  the highly-rated night-time talk show.

But, there was no apology, which irked some.

Erin Matson, an executive at the "National Organization for Women" - for example - labelled Letterman's so-called "jocularity" offensive.

"That plays into the same old sex stereotypes that men can do whatever but a woman should be ashamed of their sexuality," she lamented.

"We're just disgusted that all these Hollywood men think they can do whatever they want."

A spokesperson for Letterman's production company - Worldwide Pants (yes, the irony has not escaped me) - emphatically noted for the record in a terse press statement that the company's sexual harassment policy did not prohibit sexual relationships between managers and employees.

But, in view of the fact Letterman probably owns the company - and likewise - was iundoubtedly involved in setting-up policy for the production outlet - that defense doesn't hold much water in my estimation.

The fact that no female employee (or male worker, for that matter) has ever come forward and accused Letterman of sexual harassment or inappropriate conduct bodes well for the late-night court jester until the current swirl of controversy dies down.

So, what's the big deal?

Some argue that discussing the incident on air (making jokes about the drama, for starters) was not only off-putting but outrageous.

On the contrary, Letterman effected damage control by "coming clean" the other night.

"I have had sex with women who worked on the show.  And it would be embarrassing if it were made public. Perhaps it would. Especially for the women," he noted without batting an eye.

Curiously, it was a jealous boyfriend by the name of Robert Halderman, who ended up trying to put the screws to the wealthy entertainer.

Halderman, a producer for a true crime show  (48 Hours) entered a plea of not guilty on Friday for allegedly trying to blackmail Letterman for $2 million - in what amounted to a bizarre shake-down- which still has the Nation reeling by virtue of the magnitude of its stupidity alone.

Initially, Halderman left a money-demand (in the form of a letter addressed to Dave) in the talk-show host's unguarded vehicle at the CBS parking facillity.  After accepting, and attempting to cash a "fake" $2 million check (duh!), the disgruntled business associate was arrested a scant few hours later outside the CBS News offices on West 57th Street in New York City.

A spokesperson for the law enforcement agency which manipulated events behind-the-scenes under the full extent of the law - to establish grounds for an arrest on legitimate legal grounds - noted for the record that the extortion attempt was quite real in their minds.

A package that was handed off  to Letterman, for example, underscored there were "clear, explicit and actual threats that indicated the defendant intended to destroy the reputation of  Mr. Letterman and submit his and his family to humiliation and ridicule."

Meanwhile, industry-insiders have called attention to the fact that the sh** hits the old fan at a most inopportune time for Letterman.

In recent weeks, the Late Show has been trouncing rivals at the witching hour, and CBS was hoping the trend would continue on through the next ratings period.

Understandably, the suits at the network are wringing their hands in dismay.

Although Dave may have fallen from Grace - and disappointed a handful of fans, friends, and business associates in the process - it is doubtful, in my mind's eye, anyway - that the comic's poplularity will take a tumble.

In fact, it was reported on the news just this morning, that lines have been forming outside of CBS for tickets for tonight's show (Dave's first-day back to taping after his announcement on Thursday of last week).

Maybe that old axiom is true: there is no such thing as bad publicity.

If anything, the whole scandalous episode in his life has humanized the entertainer in the eyes of the public.

The once insightful social slash political commentator fell off his horse because of a problem with sexual addiction.

Not difficult to fathom when you consider that a stiff di** has no conscience.

Welcome to the club, Dave!

In closing, I am bestowing the flying fu** finger Award to Jeraldo Rivera for his skewered take on the issues on a segment of his show broadcast last night.

If you recall, Jeraldo's claims to fame are (1) he climbed between the sheets with Bette Midler many moons ago (2) uncovered an "empty vault" once owned by Al Capone (3) suffers persistent credibility problems in respect to his reporting skills.

Last night he did not disappoint; in fact, he pulled the biggest boner of all time.

In a nutshell, the ditzy has-been not only attempted to cast doubt on Letterman's actions - but actually inferred wrongdoing - on the aging Lothario's part.

"There must be something there,"  he mused to his invited on-air guests.

The experts, in question (emphasis), included one gentleman who worked alongside the perpetrator of the extortion attempt for a dozen-or-so years (who vowed that the TV producer was upstanding and forthright) and an attorney in the defendant's corner (he's preparing to lodge a defense on behalf of the accused in the upcoming legal proceedings) who not only sought to justify Halderman's actions -  but also had the audacity  -  to try to wash away the notion of any criminal intent.

It was not until about two-thirds of the way through the irratating fiasco that one guest was finally inclined to remind everyone that Letterman was the actual "victim".

Yes, the press is always crying foul when a "victim" is blamed and/or accused of inviting the wrongful illegal conduct of another.

Why the full-frontal attack on Letterman in the wake of the disturbing revelations, then?

Letterman's only crime, if that, was that he poked fun at the indiscretions of others.

Now, he has "egg on the face", and is suffering from a heady dose of  instant "bad karma".

However, it is important to note - that rather than shy away or hide from the truth - Letterman has faced the controversy head on.

That's the first step in the right direction.

I surmise that Dave's fans - a cynical lot - will stick by the "dude" nonetheless.

And, in the near future - compassionate intelligent TV viewers - will find it in their hearts to forgive, too.

A quote springs to mind which is highly appropriate:

"To err is human
To forgive Divine"

Amen!




Sunday, October 4, 2009

Barack Obama...bows to pressure! Meets with General McChrystal on Air Force One!





On a talk show last week Army General Stanley McCrystal noted that he met with the President just once over the past few months, regarding the troubling crisis surfacing in Afghanistan.

Shortly thereafter, critics noted that former President George W. Bush often met with his "Generals" - and generally (no pun intended) - was inclined to meet their needs for the battlefield.

In response - bowing to pressure perhaps? - the President arranged to lock heads with McCrystal on Air Force One during a break from his Olympic bid folly overseas in Denmark.

The meeting was apparently quite fruitful.

Allegedly, Barack Obama and McCrystal found common ground in the notion that it was a helpful process, in spite of the fact no immediate decisions were made on the tarmack.

A few scant hours later, however, the Pentagon announced that the general's official (?) request for more troops for the war did not fall on deaf ears and will be sent on to the White house for review this upcoming week.

The President must wrangle with various issues, undoubtedly.

Should the U.S. follow through on its mission in Afghanistan, for example, or scale back the military and expand operations to target terrorists in Pakistan.

The former would require an additonal 40,000 troops.

Pretty soon, as the draft pool because shallow, a handful of politicians may have to offer up their own sons, to give it the old college try.

Are rich and powerful willing to accept the sacrifice?

News at 11!




Roman Polanski...must face day in court! Debra Winger looney tunes...


Fantasy world clouds Winger's grasp on reality!



The swagger of a rapist!




When celebrated director Roman Polanski was apprehended this past week on his way to accept a coveted award at a Film Festival in Switzerland - the reaction of the power-players in Hollywood was not only swift and severe - but wild and outspoken.

For example, Debra Winger (who once held promise as a fine actress with a career now in the dumper) snapped up a ream of paper - and like a tot in  a nasty tantrum - began waving a petition (consisting of a list of Tinsel Town heavy-weights) demanding Polanski's release forewith on the bizarre premise that there had been a great miscarriage of justice!

Curiously, as I was channel-surfing last night, I spied a promo for an upcoming broadcast of one of her tired old films - The Black Widow - which raised my antennae a tad.

Was this just a publicity stunt to bolster Winger's career in the International spotlight?

Debra who, you say?

Gotcha!

Winger, and her supporters, have skewered - overlooked even - the on-point legal issues that are relevant in respect to the Polanski rape case.

Just like any individual charged with a crime in a civilized society, Polanski is required to appear for his day in court (and present a proper legal defense).

The notion that officials in Switzerland should "release" Polanski because thirty years have passed (and the auteur directed award-winning films such as "The Piano") is a mind-boggling jarring one.

For argument's sake, let's say a jealous suitor murdered his girlfriend, and managed to escape the long arm of the law for years on end.

A couple of decades later, if the fugitive has not been arrested and convicted of the damning crime, should the court's just dismiss the case because it is a "cold file"?

Most certainly not.

Many have accused the District Attorney - Steve Cooley - of grandstanding and taking advantage of the Polanski scandal for political reasons.

Normally, with Cooley, that would be the case.

In this current scenario, however, he is correct in his stance in my opinion.

"It's about completing justice," noted Cooley recently for the record.

"Just is not complete when someone leaves the jurisdiction of the court."

For this reason, Polanski  (not above the law, is he?) must appear before the U.S. Judge originally assigned to the case (or for hearing with a bench-warmer in that Judge's absence) and face the music.

In that forum, Winger and her staunch immoral Hollywood friends and work associates (the attempted rape of a drug-induced victim is a reprehensible crime, after all, isn't it?) are entitled under the law to ask for leniency based on any number of factors deemed reasonable.

Currently, the Winger effort amounts to an a**-backward solution to the problem.

What a bunch of stupid hooey!

The wheels of justice may turn slowly, but they do turn.

But, not on the type of faulty screws  that Winger would foolishly (and selfishly) pray for in this ludicrous case.

Amen!



Not exactly!


 
Custom Search