Saturday, March 26, 2011

Britney Spears...San Francisco Concert! Castro shopkeepers complain!









When news broke that Britney Spears was slated to appear at an outdoor concert for free in the Castro District all the residents of the trendy community were ecstatic!

In spite of the obvious coupe for the City by the Bay - a handful of retailers in the area - complained that a swarm of concert-goers would overwhelm the streets, cause traffic jams, and clog a pathway to their front doors.

Imagine that!

What an absurd selfish notion!

In fact - Good Morning America (who is hosting the free event) - not only intends to broadcast the taped performance on March 29th, but also feature a jazzy "travelogue" (with the specific aim of boosting tourism in the picturesque European-style destination city).

Before all the "star dust" settles, there will be an avalanche of National exposure - not only for the LGBT community - but also for the delightful town with a truckload of charms to offer the savvy world traveller.

Scott Wiener (District 8 Supervisor) gushed to local reporters that it was thrilling day for the Castro District (in spite of the whining of the party-poopers).

"It will bring out a lot of traffic that day. It is a great promotion for San Francisco," he chirped, excitedly.

Indeed!

Unfortunately, due to alleged security issues, the concert was moved to the Civic Center.

The ABC special event will tape tomorrow, Sunday March 27th (between 12 noon and 1 p.m.), and broadcast on Tuesday, March 29th (2011).

The concert has been timed to be air in tandem with Britney's new sizzling-hot album "Femme Fatale".

See 'ya there!




Britney loves Castro District!
(But, not enough)




Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Charlie Sheen...jumps ship to Fox! Jimmy Kimmel good kisser!


 



 





Door still open?





Charlie Sheen (winning!) trotted out onto the stage of  a live! talk show last night and planted a big sloppy kiss on Jimmy Kimmel's mouth!

"Moist lips," Charlie grinned, as the audience beneath the footlights roared in approval!

If anyone knows anything about "moist lips", it's certainly the wild & woolly diminutive actor sweeping the Nation with his manic  (pathetic & desperate?) brand of humor!

And, Sheen was not without gifts, either.

Talk about swag!

The drug-addled superstar reached into his grab-bag of goodies and proceeded to plunk down a nifty coffee mug with the lovable image of a fox etched on its face.

Avid fans ecstatically cheered the "tiger blood" one on, also, as he tossed a bevy of t-shirts in their midst with some of his latest slogans (true gems) emblazoned on the front.

"Duh!"

"Winning!"

Though one should never look a gift horse in the mouth, the spontaneous moment begged the question.

Are the rumors true?

Tabloid gossips have been all a-buzz with the scuttlebutt that Sheen has signed on with the Fox network.

Well, the brass over there are no strangers to controversy, so go figure!

News at 11!

http://www.thetattler.biz





Charlie plays the perfect foil!

Experian, TransUnion & Equifax...settle class-action lawsuit! Violations of FCRA persist!








Claimants in a class-action lawsuit (filed by the Federal Trade Commission on their behalf) received notices by U.S. Post this week requesting that supporting documentary evidence be submitted to the Court (by a March 31st deadline) with the express purpose of calculating "Actual Damage Awards" for individual Plaintiffs named in the pending legal action now that an out-of-court settlement has been reached.

As I reported in a prior post a few months ago, the Federal Trade Commission brought the litigation against the defendants - Experian, TransUnion & Equifax - to compensate aggrieved parties for damages they suffered due to flagrant Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act at the three major credit bureaus.

Post: 10/10/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/experiantrans-union-equifax-nts.html

In the moving papers - "White, et al v. Experian Information Solutions - the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants posted false, misleading, and erroneous data on their credit profiles which resulted in - a denial of credit, loss of potential employment, right to tenancy on rental properties, rejection of car loan applications, and poor credit ratings - all to their damage.

In spite of being "noticed" of the errors - all of the three defendants not only failed to delete the false information - but proceeded to willfully and wrongfully engaged in a conspiracy to cover-up their Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Ultimately, the legal rights of Americans around the country were violated at whim and with little regard for the law of the land (or any remorse for their misdeeds, either).

Pursuant to the out-of-court settlement agreement, the dollar amount that will be paid for "Convenience" and "Actual Damage Award" claims will depend on the total number of claims validated by the office of the Settlement Administrator (appointed by the Court). 

The amount of the awards to be paid with respect to each category of "Actual Damage" claims will be increased or decreased, pro rata, to reflect the number of valid claims in each category.

Given the response rate to the prior "Notice of Settlement" (mailed by U.S. Post), and the number of Class Members who may qualify for Actual Damage Awards, and depending on the number of claimants who file claims that meet the criteria, Actual Damage Awards are estimated to range between $150 and $750 for denial of employment claims, between $100 and $500 for mortgage or rental denial claims, and between $30 and $150 for claims based on other credit-related claims. 

Depending on the number of claimants who file claims that meet the criteria for Actual Damage Awards, Convenience Awards are estimated to range between $15 and $35.

Claimants (plaintiffs in the class action suit) may elect to "opt out" of the settlement offer and pursue their own personal litigation in the appropriate court of jurisdiction.

For those Class Members who previously made a claim for an Actual Damage Award, the Court has extended the deadline to opt out (request exclusion from) or object to the settlement (including Class Counsel's application for attorneys' fees and costs which may be found on the settlement-offer website:

 www.bankruptcydischargesettlement.com

To opt out, parties must send a written request to:

White, et al v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Attn: Exclusion Requests
c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.
P.O. Box 9517
Dublin, OH
43017-4817

All requests must include the plaintiff's full name, address, telephone number, signature, and a specific statement noting the request to "opt out".

Detailed instructions on how to prepare a "Notice" to opt out are provided on the website also.

Claimants may be well-advised to "opt out" and pursue their own litigation to avoid being bound by the terms of the agreement - especially in the event future violations persist - which may warrant additional recovery of damages.

For example, in recent days, claimants have lamented that - in spite of the out-of-court settlement - all three defendants (Experian, TransUnion & Equifax) have continued to post false, misleading, and/or erroneous information on their credit reports (in spite of promises to the court to refrain from doing so in the future).
Undoubtedly, the big brass at the credit bureaus are not unlike giant corporations around the country - who, when push comes to shove - elect to take the easiest route out to save their precious a**es!

Obviously, the FTC settlement is a mere slap on the wrist, in the overall scheme of things.

I say, haul 'the culprits into the town square, and string 'em up by the balls.

And, I'll be standing in line to tar 'n feather the deceitful low-life bastards, alongside the rest of 'ya!

Mr. President, there outta be a law!

http://www.thetattler.biz





FTC filed class-action suit on behalf of consumers!

Dancing with the Stars...Kirstie Alley hoofs! Sequined shopsy sausage debut!




Kirstie pretty beneath all the lard!







"Cheeky," roared Bruno Tonioli , as the studio audience hooted-and-hollered, and a dolled up Kirstie Alley struggled to catch her breath, after a pretty dazzling spin on the the dance floor last night at ABC TV Studios.

In fact, right up 'til the vote count, her "girls"continued to heave heavily from the strain of the high-spirited strenuous work-out she'd just performed to perfection (according to the excited Judges, that is).

On her much-ballyhooed "opening night" on "Dancing with the Stars", the former "Cheers" star (once-married to the "big one" Parker Stevenson") was ecstatic for having nabbed kudos from the cooing (normally-discerning) eagle-eyed adjudicators on the sidelines.

Unfortunately, the par-tay frock Ms. Alley tossed on accentuated the unsightly and the obese - um - obvious (to her frumpy detriment).

The body-fitting threads (cut high-on-the-leg and low-on-the-chest) cried out for the Fashion Police to storm the stage - spread-eagle the ballsy-bimbo-babe, cuff-her - and haul her off for a stint in flab rehab (to be sure!).

Kirstie's appearance was somewhat reminiscent of a sequined sausage (from my bird's eye in the wings).

Free-floating fabric would have been preferable to the "stuffed-in" (hanging-out?) look that - inevitably - failed to conceal a truckload of midnight munchies that had taken their toll on her once body-electric of starlet yesteryears.

To her credit, Ms. Alley elected to trot out in chic black, and avoided the perils of dreaded (God-awful) bold-patterns-extraordinaire (think mu mu) that hefty gals are inclined to don when they hunker down in search of a security blanket.

If Ms. Alley hires on a skilled fashion designer in coming weeks - a wizard sensitive to her special needs - the remainder of her stint on "Dancing with the Stars" may be worth tuning into.

Kirstie, I say a little prayer for you!






 
Custom Search